Model Comparison
Granite 4.1 3B
vs. Llama 3.2 Instruct 90B (Vision)
Comparing 2 AI models · 11 benchmarks · IBM, Meta
Recommended Pick
Me Llama 3.2 Instruct 90B (Vision) 6 metric wins Strongest on: Throughput, Reasoning, Intelligence
Lowest Price
Granite 4.1 3B
$0.00/1M input price
Best Reasoning
Llama 3.2 Instruct 90B (Vision)
25.6 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Best for Coding
Granite 4.1 3B
5.5 coding index
Composite Indices
Higher is better; speed and price are normalized
Standard Benchmarks
Only benchmarks with data are shown
Differences That Matter
Price gap
Granite 4.1 3B is ∞x cheaper on input tokens than Llama 3.2 Instruct 90B (Vision).
Reasoning gap
Llama 3.2 Instruct 90B (Vision) leads Granite 4.1 3B by 11.2 points on reasoning.
Top-pick rationale
Llama 3.2 Instruct 90B (Vision) wins 6 measurable categories, including Throughput, Reasoning, Intelligence, GPQA.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
Granite 4.1 3B
IBM
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Llama 3.2 Instruct 90B (Vision)
Meta
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Full Comparison
| Metric | IB Granite 4.1 3B | Top Pick Me Llama 3.2 Instruct 90B (Vision) |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $0.00/1M | $1.38/1M |
| Output Cost | $0.00/1M | $1.38/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | — | $1.38/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | IBM | Meta |
| Release Date | Apr 29, 2026 | Sep 25, 2024 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | — | 46.1 tok/s |
| TTFT | — | 533ms |
| Latency | — | 533ms |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | — | 100.0 |
| Reasoning Score | 14.4 | 25.6 |
| Intelligence | 8.5 | 11.9 |
| Coding | 5.5 | — |
| Standard Benchmarks | ||
| GPQA | 31.4% | 43.2% |
| MMLU Pro | — | 67.1% |
| HLE | 3.4% | 4.9% |
| LiveCodeBench | — | 21.4% |
| MATH 500 | — | 62.9% |
| AIME (Original) | — | 5.0% |
| SciCode | 11.9% | 24.0% |
| LCR | 3.0% | — |
| IFBench | 33.7% | — |
| TAU-bench v2 | 19.6% | — |
| TerminalBench Hard | 2.3% | — |
Key Takeaways
Granite 4.1 3B offers the best value at $0.00/1M, making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
Llama 3.2 Instruct 90B (Vision) has the strongest reasoning profile with a 25.6 reasoning score, combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
Granite 4.1 3B reaches a 5.5 coding index, making it the top choice for software development and code generation tasks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens, suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
Granite 4.1 3B
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
- Code generation
- Software development
Llama 3.2 Instruct 90B (Vision)
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
