Model Comparison
Grok 3
vs. Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort)
Comparing 2 AI models · 0 benchmarks · SpaceXAI, Anthropic
Recommended Pick
AnClaude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort)3 metric winsStrongest on: Value, Reasoning, Intelligence
Best Value
Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort)
100.0 value score
40.7 reasoning / $10.00/1M
Lowest Price
Grok 3
$4.00/1M input price
Best Reasoning
Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort)
40.7 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Best for Coding
Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort)
73.6 coding index
Differences That Matter
Best value
Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort) has the strongest quality-to-price mix at 100.0 out of 100 value points.
Price gap
Grok 3 is 1.3x cheaper on input tokens than Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort).
Reasoning gap
Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort) leads Grok 3 by 28.6 points on reasoning.
Top-pick rationale
Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort) wins 3 measurable categories, including Value, Reasoning, Intelligence.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
Grok 3
SpaceXAI
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort)
Anthropic
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Secure AI Chat made in Europe
Use Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini alongside with EU-Hosted Models like Deepseek, Qwen & Kimi.
EU-hosted inference
Servers in Germany & Finland. Designed to meet strict GDPR and ISO 27001 compliance requirements.
Full Comparison
| Metric | Sp Grok 3 | Top Pick An Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort) |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $4.00/1M | $5.00/1M |
| Output Cost | $20.00/1M | $25.00/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | $8.00/1M | $10.00/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | SpaceXAI | Anthropic |
| Release Date | Feb 19, 2025 | Apr 16, 2026 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | — | 47.9 tok/s |
| TTFT | — | 23120ms |
| Latency | — | 23120ms |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | 37.2 | 100.0 |
| Reasoning Score | 12.1 | 40.7 |
| Intelligence | 12.1 | 40.7 |
| Coding | — | 73.6 |
Key Takeaways
Grok 3 offers the best value at $4.00/1M,making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort) has the strongest reasoning profile with a 40.7 reasoning score,combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort) reaches a 73.6 coding index,making it the top choice for software development and code generation tasks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens,suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
Grok 3
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort)
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
- Code generation
- Software development
