Model Comparison
Grok 4.7 (High)
vs. Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Comparing 2 AI models · 0 benchmarks · SpaceXAI, Alibaba
Recommended Pick
Strongest on: Value, Throughput, Latency
Best Value
Grok 4.7 (High)
100.0 value score
35.0 reasoning / $3.00/1M
Lowest Price
Grok 4.7 (High)
$2.00/1M input price
Best Reasoning
Grok 4.7 (High)
35.0 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Best for Coding
Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
76.2 coding index
Differences That Matter
Best value
Grok 4.7 (High) has the strongest quality-to-price mix at 100.0 out of 100 value points.
Speed gap
Grok 4.7 (High) generates about 2.3x as many tokens per second as Qwen3.8 Max (0902).
Reasoning gap
Grok 4.7 (High) leads Qwen3.8 Max (0902) by 1.4 points on reasoning.
Top-pick rationale
Grok 4.7 (High) wins 5 measurable categories, including Value, Throughput, Latency, Reasoning.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
Grok 4.7 (High)
SpaceXAI
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Alibaba
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Secure AI Chat made in Europe
Use open-weight models like DeepSeek, Qwen and Kimi in one app.
EU-hosted open models, one API
Servers in Germany & Finland. Operated by a German company under the GDPR, DPA available, ISO 27001-certified data centres.
Full Comparison
| Metric | Top Pick Sp Grok 4.7 (High) | Al Qwen3.8 Max (0902) |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $2.00/1M | $2.00/1M |
| Output Cost | $6.00/1M | $6.00/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | $3.00/1M | $3.00/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | SpaceXAI | Alibaba |
| Release Date | Sep 21, 2026 | Sep 2, 2026 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | 97.1 tok/s | 41.6 tok/s |
| TTFT | 21630ms | 3060ms |
| Latency | 21630ms | 51090ms |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | 100.0 | 96.0 |
| Reasoning Score | 35.0 | 33.6 |
| Intelligence | 35.0 | 33.6 |
| Coding | — | 76.2 |
Key Takeaways
Grok 4.7 (High) offers the best value at $2.00/1M,making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
Grok 4.7 (High) has the strongest reasoning profile with a 35.0 reasoning score,combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) reaches a 76.2 coding index,making it the top choice for software development and code generation tasks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens,suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
Grok 4.7 (High)
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
- Code generation
- Software development
Recommended Comparisons
Popular alternatives
