Model Comparison
Hermes 3 - Llama-3.1 70B
vs. 7B Instruct
Comparing 2 AI models · 10 benchmarks · Nous Research, Mistral
Recommended Pick
No Hermes 3 - Llama-3.1 70B 9 metric wins Strongest on: Value, Reasoning, Intelligence
Best Value
Hermes 3 - Llama-3.1 70B
100.0 value score
22.2 reasoning / $0.30/1M
Lowest Price
7B Instruct
$0.20/1M input price
Best Reasoning
Hermes 3 - Llama-3.1 70B
22.2 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Composite Indices
Higher is better; speed and price are normalized
Standard Benchmarks
Only benchmarks with data are shown
Differences That Matter
Best value
Hermes 3 - Llama-3.1 70B has the strongest quality-to-price mix at 100.0 out of 100 value points.
Price gap
7B Instruct is 1.5x cheaper on input tokens than Hermes 3 - Llama-3.1 70B.
Speed gap
7B Instruct generates about 3.5x as many tokens per second as Hermes 3 - Llama-3.1 70B.
Reasoning gap
Hermes 3 - Llama-3.1 70B leads 7B Instruct by 13.9 points on reasoning.
Top-pick rationale
Hermes 3 - Llama-3.1 70B wins 9 measurable categories, including Value, Reasoning, Intelligence, GPQA.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
Hermes 3 - Llama-3.1 70B
Nous Research
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
7B Instruct
Mistral
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Full Comparison
| Metric | Top Pick No Hermes 3 - Llama-3.1 70B | Mi 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $0.30/1M | $0.20/1M |
| Output Cost | $0.30/1M | $0.23/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.30/1M | $0.21/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | Nous Research | Mistral |
| Release Date | Aug 15, 2024 | Sep 27, 2023 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | 32.0 tok/s | 112.2 tok/s |
| TTFT | 373ms | 371ms |
| Latency | 373ms | 371ms |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | 100.0 | 54.5 |
| Reasoning Score | 22.2 | 8.3 |
| Intelligence | 10.6 | 7.4 |
| Standard Benchmarks | ||
| GPQA | 40.1% | 17.7% |
| MMLU Pro | 57.1% | 24.5% |
| HLE | 4.1% | 4.3% |
| LiveCodeBench | 18.8% | 4.6% |
| MATH 500 | 53.8% | 12.1% |
| AIME (Original) | 2.3% | 0.0% |
| SciCode | 23.1% | 2.4% |
| LCR | — | 0.0% |
| IFBench | — | 19.9% |
| TAU-bench v2 | — | 0.0% |
Key Takeaways
7B Instruct offers the best value at $0.20/1M, making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
Hermes 3 - Llama-3.1 70B has the strongest reasoning profile with a 22.2 reasoning score, combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens, suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
Hermes 3 - Llama-3.1 70B
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
7B Instruct
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
