Model Comparison
Ling 3.0 Flash
vs. Claude Opus 5.5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Default Fallback)
Comparing 2 AI models · 0 benchmarks · InclusionAI, Anthropic
Recommended Pick
Strongest on: Value, Input price, Output price
Best Value
Ling 3.0 Flash
100.0 value score
24.9 reasoning / $0.11/1M
Lowest Price
Ling 3.0 Flash
$0.07/1M input price
Best Reasoning
Claude Opus 5.5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Default Fallback)
57.6 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Best for Coding
Ling 3.0 Flash
50.6 coding index
Differences That Matter
Best value
Ling 3.0 Flash has the strongest quality-to-price mix at 100.0 out of 100 value points.
Price gap
Ling 3.0 Flash is 57.1x cheaper on input tokens than Claude Opus 5.5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Default Fallback).
Reasoning gap
Claude Opus 5.5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Default Fallback) leads Ling 3.0 Flash by 32.7 points on reasoning.
Top-pick rationale
Ling 3.0 Flash wins 4 measurable categories, including Value, Input price, Output price, Blended price.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
Ling 3.0 Flash
InclusionAI
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Claude Opus 5.5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Default Fallback)
Anthropic
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Secure AI Chat made in Europe
Use Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini alongside with EU-Hosted Models like Deepseek, Qwen & Kimi.
EU-hosted inference
Servers in Germany & Finland. Designed to meet strict GDPR and ISO 27001 compliance requirements.
Full Comparison
| Metric | Top Pick In Ling 3.0 Flash | An Claude Opus 5.5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Default Fallback) |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $0.07/1M | $4.00/1M |
| Output Cost | $0.22/1M | $20.00/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.11/1M | $8.00/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | InclusionAI | Anthropic |
| Release Date | Aug 4, 2026 | Sep 22, 2026 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | 372.8 tok/s | — |
| TTFT | 2990ms | — |
| Latency | 8360ms | — |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | 100.0 | 3.1 |
| Reasoning Score | 24.9 | 57.6 |
| Intelligence | 24.9 | 57.6 |
| Coding | 50.6 | — |
Key Takeaways
Ling 3.0 Flash offers the best value at $0.07/1M,making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
Claude Opus 5.5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Default Fallback) has the strongest reasoning profile with a 57.6 reasoning score,combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
Ling 3.0 Flash reaches a 50.6 coding index,making it the top choice for software development and code generation tasks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens,suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
Ling 3.0 Flash
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
- Code generation
- Software development
Claude Opus 5.5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Default Fallback)
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
