Model Comparison
Llama 3.3 Instruct 70B
vs. M1 40k
Comparing 2 AI models · 12 benchmarks · Meta, MiniMax
Recommended Pick
Mi M1 40k 18 metric wins Strongest on: Input price, Output price, TTFT
Lowest Price
M1 40k
$0.00/1M input price
Best Reasoning
M1 40k
43.2 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Best for Coding
M1 40k
14.1 coding index
Composite Indices
Higher is better; speed and price are normalized
Standard Benchmarks
Only benchmarks with data are shown
Differences That Matter
Price gap
M1 40k is ∞x cheaper on input tokens than Llama 3.3 Instruct 70B.
Reasoning gap
M1 40k leads Llama 3.3 Instruct 70B by 15.9 points on reasoning.
Coding gap
M1 40k leads Llama 3.3 Instruct 70B by 3.4 points on coding.
Top-pick rationale
M1 40k wins 18 measurable categories, including Input price, Output price, TTFT, Latency.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
Llama 3.3 Instruct 70B
Meta
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
M1 40k
MiniMax
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Full Comparison
| Metric | Me Llama 3.3 Instruct 70B | Top Pick Mi M1 40k |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $0.58/1M | $0.00/1M |
| Output Cost | $0.71/1M | $0.00/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.61/1M | — |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | Meta | MiniMax |
| Release Date | Dec 6, 2024 | Jun 17, 2025 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | 95.7 tok/s | — |
| TTFT | 624ms | — |
| Latency | 624ms | — |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | 100.0 | — |
| Reasoning Score | 27.3 | 43.2 |
| Intelligence | 14.5 | 20.9 |
| Coding | 10.7 | 14.1 |
| Math | 7.7 | 13.7 |
| Standard Benchmarks | ||
| GPQA | 49.8% | 68.2% |
| MMLU Pro | 71.3% | 80.8% |
| HLE | 4.0% | 7.5% |
| LiveCodeBench | 28.8% | 65.7% |
| MATH 500 | 77.3% | 97.2% |
| AIME 2025 | 7.7% | 13.7% |
| AIME (Original) | 30.0% | 81.3% |
| SciCode | 26.0% | 37.8% |
| LCR | 15.0% | 51.7% |
| IFBench | 47.1% | 41.2% |
| TAU-bench v2 | 26.6% | 31.6% |
| TerminalBench Hard | 3.0% | 2.3% |
Key Takeaways
M1 40k offers the best value at $0.00/1M, making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
M1 40k has the strongest reasoning profile with a 43.2 reasoning score, combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
M1 40k reaches a 14.1 coding index, making it the top choice for software development and code generation tasks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens, suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
Llama 3.3 Instruct 70B
- General-purpose AI
- Versatile applications
M1 40k
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
- Code generation
- Software development
