Model Comparison

Llama 4 Scout
vs. Claude Fable 5.1 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Default Fallback)

Comparing 2 AI models · 0 benchmarks · Meta, Anthropic

Recommended Pick

Llama 4 Scout7 metric wins

Strongest on: Value, Input price, Output price

Best Value

Llama 4 Scout

100.0 value score

6.5 reasoning / $0.31/1M

Lowest Price

Llama 4 Scout

$0.19/1M input price

Best Reasoning

Claude Fable 5.1 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Default Fallback)

53.4 reasoning score

Blends available reasoning benchmarks

Best for Coding

Claude Fable 5.1 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Default Fallback)

81.6 coding index

Differences That Matter

Best value

Llama 4 Scout has the strongest quality-to-price mix at 100.0 out of 100 value points.

Price gap

Llama 4 Scout is 52.6x cheaper on input tokens than Claude Fable 5.1 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Default Fallback).

Speed gap

Llama 4 Scout generates about 1.4x as many tokens per second as Claude Fable 5.1 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Default Fallback).

Reasoning gap

Claude Fable 5.1 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Default Fallback) leads Llama 4 Scout by 46.9 points on reasoning.

Coding gap

Claude Fable 5.1 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Default Fallback) leads Llama 4 Scout by 73.4 points on coding.

Live compare

Response Face-Off

Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.

10 comparisons left in 24h

Llama 4 Scout

Secure AI Chat made in Europe

Use Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini alongside with EU-Hosted Models like Deepseek, Qwen & Kimi.

Chat for free

EU-hosted inference

Servers in Germany & Finland. Designed to meet strict GDPR and ISO 27001 compliance requirements.

Get API access

Full Comparison

Metric	Top Pick Me Llama 4 Scout Meta	An Claude Fable 5.1 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Default Fallback) Anthropic
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input Cost	$0.19/1M	$10.00/1M
Output Cost	$0.68/1M	$50.00/1M
Blended (3:1)	$0.31/1M	$20.00/1M
Specifications
Organization	Meta	Anthropic
Release Date	Apr 5, 2025	Sep 1, 2026
Performance & Speed
Throughput	92.4 tok/s	66.7 tok/s
TTFT	860ms	278200ms
Latency	860ms	278200ms
Composite Indices
Value Score	100.0	12.8
Reasoning Score	6.5	53.4
Intelligence	6.5	53.4
Coding	8.2	81.6

Key Takeaways

Llama 4 Scout offers the best value at $0.19/1M,making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.

Claude Fable 5.1 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Default Fallback) has the strongest reasoning profile with a 53.4 reasoning score,combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.

Claude Fable 5.1 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Default Fallback) reaches a 81.6 coding index,making it the top choice for software development and code generation tasks.

All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens,suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.