Model Comparison
MiMo-V2-Flash (Feb 2026)
vs. MiMo-V2-Flash (Non-reasoning)
Comparing 2 AI models · 10 benchmarks · Xiaomi
Recommended Pick
Xi MiMo-V2-Flash (Feb 2026) 10 metric wins Strongest on: Throughput, TTFT, Intelligence
Best Value
MiMo-V2-Flash (Non-reasoning)
100.0 value score
46.4 reasoning / $0.15/1M
Lowest Price
MiMo-V2-Flash (Feb 2026)
$0.10/1M input price
Best Reasoning
MiMo-V2-Flash (Non-reasoning)
46.4 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Composite Indices
Higher is better; speed and price are normalized
Standard Benchmarks
Only benchmarks with data are shown
Differences That Matter
Best value
MiMo-V2-Flash (Non-reasoning) has the strongest quality-to-price mix at 100.0 out of 100 value points.
Reasoning gap
MiMo-V2-Flash (Non-reasoning) leads MiMo-V2-Flash (Feb 2026) by 0.8 points on reasoning.
Top-pick rationale
MiMo-V2-Flash (Feb 2026) wins 10 measurable categories, including Throughput, TTFT, Intelligence, GPQA.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
MiMo-V2-Flash (Feb 2026)
Xiaomi
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
MiMo-V2-Flash (Non-reasoning)
Xiaomi
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Chat with leading AI models
Use Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini alongside with EU-Hosted Models like Deepseek, Qwen & Kimi.
EU-hosted inference
Servers in Germany & Finland. Designed to meet strict GDPR and ISO 27001 compliance requirements.
Full Comparison
| Metric | Top Pick Xi MiMo-V2-Flash (Feb 2026) | Xi MiMo-V2-Flash (Non-reasoning) |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $0.10/1M | $0.10/1M |
| Output Cost | $0.30/1M | $0.30/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.15/1M | $0.15/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | Xiaomi | Xiaomi |
| Release Date | Dec 16, 2025 | Dec 16, 2025 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | 81.6 tok/s | 79.8 tok/s |
| TTFT | 2142ms | 2271ms |
| Latency | 26649ms | 2271ms |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | 98.2 | 100.0 |
| Reasoning Score | 45.6 | 46.4 |
| Intelligence | 33.2 | 23.1 |
| Math | — | 67.7 |
| Standard Benchmarks | ||
| GPQA | 83.5% | 65.6% |
| MMLU Pro | — | 74.4% |
| HLE | 20.0% | 8.0% |
| LiveCodeBench | — | 40.2% |
| AIME 2025 | — | 67.7% |
| SciCode | 38.3% | 25.9% |
| LCR | 64.3% | 31.3% |
| IFBench | 71.8% | 39.9% |
| TAU-bench v2 | 93.3% | 83.9% |
| TerminalBench Hard | 31.1% | 25.8% |
Key Takeaways
MiMo-V2-Flash (Feb 2026) offers the best value at $0.10/1M, making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
MiMo-V2-Flash (Non-reasoning) has the strongest reasoning profile with a 46.4 reasoning score, combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens, suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
MiMo-V2-Flash (Feb 2026)
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
MiMo-V2-Flash (Non-reasoning)
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
