Model Comparison
MiMo-V2-Flash (Feb 2026)
vs. M2.7
Comparing 2 AI models · 7 benchmarks · Xiaomi, MiniMax
Recommended Pick
Mi M2.7 9 metric wins Strongest on: Reasoning, Intelligence, Coding
Best Value
MiMo-V2-Flash (Feb 2026)
100.0 value score
48.3 reasoning / $0.15/1M
Lowest Price
MiMo-V2-Flash (Feb 2026)
$0.10/1M input price
Best Reasoning
M2.7
55.0 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Best for Coding
M2.7
41.9 coding index
Composite Indices
Higher is better; speed and price are normalized
Standard Benchmarks
Only benchmarks with data are shown
Differences That Matter
Best value
MiMo-V2-Flash (Feb 2026) has the strongest quality-to-price mix at 100.0 out of 100 value points.
Price gap
MiMo-V2-Flash (Feb 2026) is 3.0x cheaper on input tokens than M2.7.
Speed gap
MiMo-V2-Flash (Feb 2026) generates about 1.8x as many tokens per second as M2.7.
Reasoning gap
M2.7 leads MiMo-V2-Flash (Feb 2026) by 6.7 points on reasoning.
Coding gap
M2.7 leads MiMo-V2-Flash (Feb 2026) by 8.4 points on coding.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
MiMo-V2-Flash (Feb 2026)
Xiaomi
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
M2.7
MiniMax
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Full Comparison
| Metric | Xi MiMo-V2-Flash (Feb 2026) | Top Pick Mi M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $0.10/1M | $0.30/1M |
| Output Cost | $0.30/1M | $1.20/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.15/1M | $0.52/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | Xiaomi | MiniMax |
| Release Date | Dec 16, 2025 | Mar 18, 2026 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | 118.0 tok/s | 66.6 tok/s |
| TTFT | 1431ms | 2940ms |
| Latency | 18373ms | 39910ms |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | 100.0 | 32.5 |
| Reasoning Score | 48.3 | 55.0 |
| Intelligence | 41.5 | 49.6 |
| Coding | 33.5 | 41.9 |
| Standard Benchmarks | ||
| GPQA | 83.5% | 87.4% |
| HLE | 20.0% | 28.1% |
| SciCode | 38.3% | 47.0% |
| LCR | 64.3% | 68.7% |
| IFBench | 71.8% | 75.7% |
| TAU-bench v2 | 93.3% | 84.8% |
| TerminalBench Hard | 31.1% | 39.4% |
Key Takeaways
MiMo-V2-Flash (Feb 2026) offers the best value at $0.10/1M, making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
M2.7 has the strongest reasoning profile with a 55.0 reasoning score, combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
M2.7 reaches a 41.9 coding index, making it the top choice for software development and code generation tasks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens, suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
MiMo-V2-Flash (Feb 2026)
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
M2.7
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
- Code generation
- Software development
