Model Comparison
MiMo-V2.5
vs. Claude Opus 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback)
Comparing 2 AI models · 0 benchmarks · Xiaomi, Anthropic
Recommended Pick
XiMiMo-V2.56 metric winsStrongest on: Value, Input price, Output price
Best Value
MiMo-V2.5
100.0 value score
25.2 reasoning / $0.18/1M
Lowest Price
MiMo-V2.5
$0.14/1M input price
Best Reasoning
Claude Opus 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback)
57.6 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Best for Coding
MiMo-V2.5
56.8 coding index
Differences That Matter
Best value
MiMo-V2.5 has the strongest quality-to-price mix at 100.0 out of 100 value points.
Price gap
MiMo-V2.5 is 28.6x cheaper on input tokens than Claude Opus 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback).
Speed gap
Claude Opus 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback) generates about 1.5x as many tokens per second as MiMo-V2.5.
Reasoning gap
Claude Opus 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback) leads MiMo-V2.5 by 32.4 points on reasoning.
Top-pick rationale
MiMo-V2.5 wins 6 measurable categories, including Value, Input price, Output price, Blended price.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
MiMo-V2.5
Xiaomi
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Claude Opus 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback)
Anthropic
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Secure AI Chat made in Europe
Use Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini alongside with EU-Hosted Models like Deepseek, Qwen & Kimi.
EU-hosted open models, one API
Servers in Germany & Finland. Operated by a German company under the GDPR, DPA available, ISO 27001-certified data centres.
Full Comparison
| Metric | Top Pick Xi MiMo-V2.5 | An Claude Opus 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback) |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $0.14/1M | $4.00/1M |
| Output Cost | $0.28/1M | $20.00/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.18/1M | $8.00/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | Xiaomi | Anthropic |
| Release Date | Apr 22, 2026 | Sep 22, 2026 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | 60.5 tok/s | 93.0 tok/s |
| TTFT | 2870ms | 717480ms |
| Latency | 35940ms | 717480ms |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | 100.0 | 5.0 |
| Reasoning Score | 25.2 | 57.6 |
| Intelligence | 25.2 | 57.6 |
| Coding | 56.8 | — |
Key Takeaways
MiMo-V2.5 offers the best value at $0.14/1M,making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
Claude Opus 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback) has the strongest reasoning profile with a 57.6 reasoning score,combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
MiMo-V2.5 reaches a 56.8 coding index,making it the top choice for software development and code generation tasks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens,suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
MiMo-V2.5
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
- Code generation
- Software development
Claude Opus 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback)
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
Recommended Comparisons
Popular alternatives
