Model Comparison
MiMo-V2.5
vs. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Comparing 2 AI models · 7 benchmarks · Xiaomi, Google
Recommended Pick
GoGemini 3.1 Pro Preview12 metric winsStrongest on: Throughput, Latency, Reasoning
Best Value
MiMo-V2.5
100.0 value score
49.1 reasoning / $0.18/1M
Lowest Price
MiMo-V2.5
$0.14/1M input price
Best Reasoning
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
61.8 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Best for Coding
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
68.8 coding index
Composite Indices
Higher is better; speed and price are normalized
Standard Benchmarks
Only benchmarks with data are shown
Differences That Matter
Best value
MiMo-V2.5 has the strongest quality-to-price mix at 100.0 out of 100 value points.
Price gap
MiMo-V2.5 is 14.3x cheaper on input tokens than Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview.
Speed gap
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview generates about 1.8x as many tokens per second as MiMo-V2.5.
Reasoning gap
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads MiMo-V2.5 by 12.7 points on reasoning.
Coding gap
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads MiMo-V2.5 by 12.0 points on coding.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
MiMo-V2.5
Xiaomi
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Chat with leading AI models
Use Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini alongside with EU-Hosted Models like Deepseek, Qwen & Kimi.
EU-hosted inference
Servers in Germany & Finland. Designed to meet strict GDPR and ISO 27001 compliance requirements.
Full Comparison
| Metric | Xi MiMo-V2.5 | Top Pick Go Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $0.14/1M | $2.00/1M |
| Output Cost | $0.28/1M | $12.00/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.18/1M | $4.50/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | Xiaomi | |
| Release Date | Apr 22, 2026 | Feb 19, 2026 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | 67.1 tok/s | 119.9 tok/s |
| TTFT | 2747ms | 17341ms |
| Latency | 32569ms | 17341ms |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | 100.0 | 4.9 |
| Reasoning Score | 49.1 | 61.8 |
| Intelligence | 37.2 | 46.5 |
| Coding | 56.8 | 68.8 |
| Standard Benchmarks | ||
| GPQA | 84.9% | 94.1% |
| HLE | 25.2% | 44.7% |
| SciCode | 43.1% | 58.9% |
| LCR | 62.7% | 72.7% |
| IFBench | 67.1% | 77.1% |
| TAU-bench v2 | 90.6% | 95.6% |
| TerminalBench Hard | 41.7% | 53.8% |
Key Takeaways
MiMo-V2.5 offers the best value at $0.14/1M,making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview has the strongest reasoning profile with a 61.8 reasoning score,combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview reaches a 68.8 coding index,making it the top choice for software development and code generation tasks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens,suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
MiMo-V2.5
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
- Code generation
- Software development
