Model Comparison
MiMo-V2.5
vs. M1 80k
Comparing 2 AI models · 12 benchmarks · Xiaomi, MiniMax
Recommended Pick
Xi MiMo-V2.5 14 metric wins Strongest on: Value, Input price, Output price
Best Value
MiMo-V2.5
100.0 value score
53.0 reasoning / $0.18/1M
Lowest Price
MiMo-V2.5
$0.14/1M input price
Best Reasoning
M1 80k
58.1 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Best for Coding
MiMo-V2.5
42.1 coding index
Composite Indices
Higher is better; speed and price are normalized
Standard Benchmarks
Only benchmarks with data are shown
Differences That Matter
Best value
MiMo-V2.5 has the strongest quality-to-price mix at 100.0 out of 100 value points.
Price gap
MiMo-V2.5 is 3.9x cheaper on input tokens than M1 80k.
Reasoning gap
M1 80k leads MiMo-V2.5 by 5.1 points on reasoning.
Coding gap
MiMo-V2.5 leads M1 80k by 27.6 points on coding.
Top-pick rationale
MiMo-V2.5 wins 14 measurable categories, including Value, Input price, Output price, Blended price.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
MiMo-V2.5
Xiaomi
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
M1 80k
MiniMax
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Full Comparison
| Metric | Top Pick Xi MiMo-V2.5 | Mi M1 80k |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $0.14/1M | $0.55/1M |
| Output Cost | $0.28/1M | $2.20/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.18/1M | $0.96/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | Xiaomi | MiniMax |
| Release Date | Apr 22, 2026 | Jun 17, 2025 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | 79.0 tok/s | — |
| TTFT | 3269ms | — |
| Latency | 28597ms | — |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | 100.0 | 19.9 |
| Reasoning Score | 53.0 | 58.1 |
| Intelligence | 49.0 | 24.4 |
| Coding | 42.1 | 14.5 |
| Math | — | 61.0 |
| Standard Benchmarks | ||
| GPQA | 84.9% | 69.7% |
| MMLU Pro | — | 81.6% |
| HLE | 25.2% | 8.2% |
| LiveCodeBench | — | 71.1% |
| MATH 500 | — | 98.0% |
| AIME 2025 | — | 61.0% |
| AIME (Original) | — | 84.7% |
| SciCode | 43.1% | 37.4% |
| LCR | 62.7% | 54.3% |
| IFBench | 67.1% | 41.8% |
| TAU-bench v2 | 90.6% | 34.2% |
| TerminalBench Hard | 41.7% | 3.0% |
Key Takeaways
MiMo-V2.5 offers the best value at $0.14/1M, making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
M1 80k has the strongest reasoning profile with a 58.1 reasoning score, combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
MiMo-V2.5 reaches a 42.1 coding index, making it the top choice for software development and code generation tasks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens, suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
MiMo-V2.5
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
- Code generation
- Software development
M1 80k
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
