Model Comparison
MiMo-V2.6-Pro
vs. Claude Fable 5.1 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Default Fallback)
Comparing 2 AI models · 0 benchmarks · Xiaomi, Anthropic
Recommended Pick
XiMiMo-V2.6-Pro7 metric winsStrongest on: Value, Input price, Output price
Best Value
MiMo-V2.6-Pro
100.0 value score
46.3 reasoning / $0.54/1M
Lowest Price
MiMo-V2.6-Pro
$0.43/1M input price
Best Reasoning
Claude Fable 5.1 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Default Fallback)
53.4 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Best for Coding
Claude Fable 5.1 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Default Fallback)
81.6 coding index
Differences That Matter
Best value
MiMo-V2.6-Pro has the strongest quality-to-price mix at 100.0 out of 100 value points.
Price gap
MiMo-V2.6-Pro is 23.3x cheaper on input tokens than Claude Fable 5.1 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Default Fallback).
Speed gap
MiMo-V2.6-Pro generates about 2.0x as many tokens per second as Claude Fable 5.1 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Default Fallback).
Reasoning gap
Claude Fable 5.1 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Default Fallback) leads MiMo-V2.6-Pro by 7.1 points on reasoning.
Top-pick rationale
MiMo-V2.6-Pro wins 7 measurable categories, including Value, Input price, Output price, Blended price.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Xiaomi
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Claude Fable 5.1 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Default Fallback)
Anthropic
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Secure AI Chat made in Europe
Use Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini alongside with EU-Hosted Models like Deepseek, Qwen & Kimi.
EU-hosted inference
Servers in Germany & Finland. Designed to meet strict GDPR and ISO 27001 compliance requirements.
Full Comparison
| Metric | Top Pick Xi MiMo-V2.6-Pro | An Claude Fable 5.1 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Default Fallback) |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $0.43/1M | $10.00/1M |
| Output Cost | $0.87/1M | $50.00/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.54/1M | $20.00/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | Xiaomi | Anthropic |
| Release Date | Sep 21, 2026 | Sep 1, 2026 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | 129.8 tok/s | 65.8 tok/s |
| TTFT | 2170ms | 298450ms |
| Latency | 17580ms | 298450ms |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | 100.0 | 3.1 |
| Reasoning Score | 46.3 | 53.4 |
| Intelligence | 46.3 | 53.4 |
| Coding | — | 81.6 |
Key Takeaways
MiMo-V2.6-Pro offers the best value at $0.43/1M,making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
Claude Fable 5.1 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Default Fallback) has the strongest reasoning profile with a 53.4 reasoning score,combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
Claude Fable 5.1 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Default Fallback) reaches a 81.6 coding index,making it the top choice for software development and code generation tasks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens,suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
MiMo-V2.6-Pro
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
Claude Fable 5.1 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Default Fallback)
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
- Code generation
- Software development
