Model Comparison
MiMo-V2-Pro
vs. GLM-5.1 (Reasoning)
Comparing 2 AI models · 7 benchmarks · Xiaomi, Z AI
Recommended Pick
Z GLM-5.1 (Reasoning) 9 metric wins Strongest on: Throughput, TTFT, Latency
Best Value
MiMo-V2-Pro
100.0 value score
51.9 reasoning / $1.50/1M
Lowest Price
MiMo-V2-Pro
$1.00/1M input price
Best Reasoning
MiMo-V2-Pro
51.9 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Best for Coding
GLM-5.1 (Reasoning)
43.4 coding index
Composite Indices
Higher is better; speed and price are normalized
Standard Benchmarks
Only benchmarks with data are shown
Differences That Matter
Best value
MiMo-V2-Pro has the strongest quality-to-price mix at 100.0 out of 100 value points.
Price gap
MiMo-V2-Pro is 1.4x cheaper on input tokens than GLM-5.1 (Reasoning).
Speed gap
GLM-5.1 (Reasoning) generates about 1.7x as many tokens per second as MiMo-V2-Pro.
Reasoning gap
MiMo-V2-Pro leads GLM-5.1 (Reasoning) by 0.2 points on reasoning.
Coding gap
GLM-5.1 (Reasoning) leads MiMo-V2-Pro by 2.0 points on coding.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
MiMo-V2-Pro
Xiaomi
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
GLM-5.1 (Reasoning)
Z AI
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Full Comparison
| Metric | Xi MiMo-V2-Pro | Top Pick Z GLM-5.1 (Reasoning) |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $1.00/1M | $1.40/1M |
| Output Cost | $3.00/1M | $4.40/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | $1.50/1M | $2.15/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | Xiaomi | Z AI |
| Release Date | Mar 18, 2026 | Apr 7, 2026 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | 44.4 tok/s | 76.2 tok/s |
| TTFT | 2194ms | 790ms |
| Latency | 68153ms | 50556ms |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | 100.0 | 69.5 |
| Reasoning Score | 51.9 | 51.7 |
| Intelligence | 40.3 | 40.2 |
| Coding | 41.4 | 43.4 |
| Standard Benchmarks | ||
| GPQA | 87.0% | 86.8% |
| HLE | 28.3% | 28.0% |
| SciCode | 42.5% | 43.8% |
| LCR | 60.7% | 62.3% |
| IFBench | 68.8% | 76.3% |
| TAU-bench v2 | 95.0% | 97.7% |
| TerminalBench Hard | 40.9% | 43.2% |
Key Takeaways
MiMo-V2-Pro offers the best value at $1.00/1M, making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
MiMo-V2-Pro has the strongest reasoning profile with a 51.9 reasoning score, combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
GLM-5.1 (Reasoning) reaches a 43.4 coding index, making it the top choice for software development and code generation tasks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens, suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
MiMo-V2-Pro
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
GLM-5.1 (Reasoning)
- Code generation
- Software development
