Model Comparison
MiMo-V2-Pro
vs. Qwen2.5 Max
Comparing 2 AI models · 11 benchmarks · Xiaomi, Alibaba
Recommended Pick
Xi MiMo-V2-Pro 10 metric wins Strongest on: Value, Input price, Output price
Best Value
MiMo-V2-Pro
100.0 value score
54.8 reasoning / $1.50/1M
Lowest Price
MiMo-V2-Pro
$1.00/1M input price
Best Reasoning
MiMo-V2-Pro
54.8 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Best for Coding
MiMo-V2-Pro
41.4 coding index
Composite Indices
Higher is better; speed and price are normalized
Standard Benchmarks
Only benchmarks with data are shown
Differences That Matter
Best value
MiMo-V2-Pro has the strongest quality-to-price mix at 100.0 out of 100 value points.
Price gap
MiMo-V2-Pro is 1.6x cheaper on input tokens than Qwen2.5 Max.
Reasoning gap
MiMo-V2-Pro leads Qwen2.5 Max by 17.6 points on reasoning.
Top-pick rationale
MiMo-V2-Pro wins 10 measurable categories, including Value, Input price, Output price, Blended price.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
MiMo-V2-Pro
Xiaomi
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Qwen2.5 Max
Alibaba
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Full Comparison
| Metric | Top Pick Xi MiMo-V2-Pro | Al Qwen2.5 Max |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $1.00/1M | $1.60/1M |
| Output Cost | $3.00/1M | $6.40/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | $1.50/1M | $2.80/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | Xiaomi | Alibaba |
| Release Date | Mar 18, 2026 | Jan 28, 2025 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | 38.1 tok/s | — |
| TTFT | 2508ms | — |
| Latency | 79327ms | — |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | 100.0 | 36.4 |
| Reasoning Score | 54.8 | 37.3 |
| Intelligence | 49.2 | 16.3 |
| Coding | 41.4 | — |
| Standard Benchmarks | ||
| GPQA | 87.0% | 58.7% |
| MMLU Pro | — | 76.2% |
| HLE | 28.3% | 4.5% |
| LiveCodeBench | — | 35.9% |
| MATH 500 | — | 83.5% |
| AIME (Original) | — | 23.3% |
| SciCode | 42.5% | 33.7% |
| LCR | 60.7% | — |
| IFBench | 68.8% | — |
| TAU-bench v2 | 95.0% | — |
| TerminalBench Hard | 40.9% | — |
Key Takeaways
MiMo-V2-Pro offers the best value at $1.00/1M, making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
MiMo-V2-Pro has the strongest reasoning profile with a 54.8 reasoning score, combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
MiMo-V2-Pro reaches a 41.4 coding index, making it the top choice for software development and code generation tasks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens, suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
MiMo-V2-Pro
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
- Code generation
- Software development
Qwen2.5 Max
- General-purpose AI
- Versatile applications
