Model Comparison
Nova Pro
vs. Qwen2.5 Instruct 72B
Comparing 2 AI models · 12 benchmarks · Amazon, Alibaba
Recommended Pick
Al Qwen2.5 Instruct 72B 17 metric wins Strongest on: Value, Input price, Output price
Best Value
Qwen2.5 Instruct 72B
100.0 value score
28.4 reasoning / $0.37/1M
Lowest Price
Qwen2.5 Instruct 72B
$0.36/1M input price
Best Reasoning
Qwen2.5 Instruct 72B
28.4 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Best for Coding
Qwen2.5 Instruct 72B
11.9 coding index
Composite Indices
Higher is better; speed and price are normalized
Standard Benchmarks
Only benchmarks with data are shown
Differences That Matter
Best value
Qwen2.5 Instruct 72B has the strongest quality-to-price mix at 100.0 out of 100 value points.
Price gap
Qwen2.5 Instruct 72B is 2.2x cheaper on input tokens than Nova Pro.
Reasoning gap
Qwen2.5 Instruct 72B leads Nova Pro by 4.1 points on reasoning.
Coding gap
Qwen2.5 Instruct 72B leads Nova Pro by 0.9 points on coding.
Top-pick rationale
Qwen2.5 Instruct 72B wins 17 measurable categories, including Value, Input price, Output price, Blended price.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
Nova Pro
Amazon
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Qwen2.5 Instruct 72B
Alibaba
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Full Comparison
| Metric | Am Nova Pro | Top Pick Al Qwen2.5 Instruct 72B |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $0.80/1M | $0.36/1M |
| Output Cost | $3.20/1M | $0.40/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | $1.40/1M | $0.37/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | Amazon | Alibaba |
| Release Date | Dec 3, 2024 | Sep 19, 2024 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | — | — |
| TTFT | — | — |
| Latency | — | — |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | 22.6 | 100.0 |
| Reasoning Score | 24.3 | 28.4 |
| Intelligence | 13.5 | 15.6 |
| Coding | 11.0 | 11.9 |
| Math | 7.0 | 14.0 |
| Standard Benchmarks | ||
| GPQA | 49.9% | 49.1% |
| MMLU Pro | 69.1% | 72.0% |
| HLE | 3.4% | 4.2% |
| LiveCodeBench | 23.3% | 27.6% |
| MATH 500 | 78.6% | 85.8% |
| AIME 2025 | 7.0% | 14.0% |
| AIME (Original) | 10.7% | 16.0% |
| SciCode | 20.8% | 26.7% |
| LCR | 19.0% | 20.3% |
| IFBench | 38.1% | 36.9% |
| TAU-bench v2 | 14.0% | 34.5% |
| TerminalBench Hard | 6.1% | 4.5% |
Key Takeaways
Qwen2.5 Instruct 72B offers the best value at $0.36/1M, making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
Qwen2.5 Instruct 72B has the strongest reasoning profile with a 28.4 reasoning score, combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
Qwen2.5 Instruct 72B reaches a 11.9 coding index, making it the top choice for software development and code generation tasks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens, suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
Nova Pro
- General-purpose AI
- Versatile applications
Qwen2.5 Instruct 72B
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
- Code generation
- Software development
