Model Comparison
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Reasoning)
vs. Claude Fable 5.1 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Default Fallback)
Comparing 2 AI models · 0 benchmarks · NVIDIA, Anthropic
Recommended Pick
NVNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Reasoning)7 metric winsStrongest on: Value, Input price, Output price
Best Value
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Reasoning)
100.0 value score
8.9 reasoning / $0.09/1M
Lowest Price
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Reasoning)
$0.05/1M input price
Best Reasoning
Claude Fable 5.1 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Default Fallback)
53.4 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Best for Coding
Claude Fable 5.1 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Default Fallback)
81.6 coding index
Differences That Matter
Best value
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Reasoning) has the strongest quality-to-price mix at 100.0 out of 100 value points.
Price gap
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Reasoning) is 200x cheaper on input tokens than Claude Fable 5.1 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Default Fallback).
Speed gap
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Reasoning) generates about 3.6x as many tokens per second as Claude Fable 5.1 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Default Fallback).
Reasoning gap
Claude Fable 5.1 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Default Fallback) leads Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Reasoning) by 44.5 points on reasoning.
Coding gap
Claude Fable 5.1 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Default Fallback) leads Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Reasoning) by 67.2 points on coding.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Reasoning)
NVIDIA
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Claude Fable 5.1 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Default Fallback)
Anthropic
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Secure AI Chat made in Europe
Use Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini alongside with EU-Hosted Models like Deepseek, Qwen & Kimi.
EU-hosted inference
Servers in Germany & Finland. Designed to meet strict GDPR and ISO 27001 compliance requirements.
Full Comparison
| Metric | Top Pick NV Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Reasoning) | An Claude Fable 5.1 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Default Fallback) |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $0.05/1M | $10.00/1M |
| Output Cost | $0.20/1M | $50.00/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.09/1M | $20.00/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | NVIDIA | Anthropic |
| Release Date | Dec 15, 2025 | Sep 1, 2026 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | 239.5 tok/s | 65.8 tok/s |
| TTFT | 1200ms | 268140ms |
| Latency | 9550ms | 268140ms |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | 100.0 | 2.6 |
| Reasoning Score | 8.9 | 53.4 |
| Intelligence | 8.9 | 53.4 |
| Coding | 14.4 | 81.6 |
Key Takeaways
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Reasoning) offers the best value at $0.05/1M,making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
Claude Fable 5.1 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Default Fallback) has the strongest reasoning profile with a 53.4 reasoning score,combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
Claude Fable 5.1 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Default Fallback) reaches a 81.6 coding index,making it the top choice for software development and code generation tasks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens,suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Reasoning)
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
Claude Fable 5.1 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Default Fallback)
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
- Code generation
- Software development
