Model Comparison
Nemotron Nano 9B V2 (Non-reasoning)
vs. Phi-4
Comparing 2 AI models · 12 benchmarks · NVIDIA, Microsoft
Recommended Pick
NV Nemotron Nano 9B V2 (Non-reasoning) 14 metric wins Strongest on: Value, Input price, Output price
Best Value
Nemotron Nano 9B V2 (Non-reasoning)
100.0 value score
39.5 reasoning / $0.09/1M
Lowest Price
Nemotron Nano 9B V2 (Non-reasoning)
$0.05/1M input price
Best Reasoning
Nemotron Nano 9B V2 (Non-reasoning)
39.5 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Best for Coding
Phi-4
11.2 coding index
Composite Indices
Higher is better; speed and price are normalized
Standard Benchmarks
Only benchmarks with data are shown
Differences That Matter
Best value
Nemotron Nano 9B V2 (Non-reasoning) has the strongest quality-to-price mix at 100.0 out of 100 value points.
Price gap
Nemotron Nano 9B V2 (Non-reasoning) is 2.5x cheaper on input tokens than Phi-4.
Speed gap
Nemotron Nano 9B V2 (Non-reasoning) generates about 3.5x as many tokens per second as Phi-4.
Reasoning gap
Nemotron Nano 9B V2 (Non-reasoning) leads Phi-4 by 10.5 points on reasoning.
Coding gap
Phi-4 leads Nemotron Nano 9B V2 (Non-reasoning) by 3.7 points on coding.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
Nemotron Nano 9B V2 (Non-reasoning)
NVIDIA
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Phi-4
Microsoft
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Full Comparison
| Metric | Top Pick NV Nemotron Nano 9B V2 (Non-reasoning) | Mi Phi-4 |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $0.05/1M | $0.13/1M |
| Output Cost | $0.20/1M | $0.50/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.09/1M | $0.22/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | NVIDIA | Microsoft |
| Release Date | Aug 18, 2025 | Dec 12, 2024 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | 133.2 tok/s | 38.1 tok/s |
| TTFT | 709ms | 526ms |
| Latency | 709ms | 526ms |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | 100.0 | 29.0 |
| Reasoning Score | 39.5 | 29.0 |
| Intelligence | 13.2 | 10.4 |
| Coding | 7.5 | 11.2 |
| Math | 62.3 | 18.0 |
| Standard Benchmarks | ||
| GPQA | 55.7% | 57.5% |
| MMLU Pro | 73.9% | 71.4% |
| HLE | 4.0% | 4.1% |
| LiveCodeBench | 70.1% | 23.1% |
| MATH 500 | — | 81.0% |
| AIME 2025 | 62.3% | 18.0% |
| AIME (Original) | — | 14.3% |
| SciCode | 20.9% | 26.0% |
| LCR | 22.7% | 0.0% |
| IFBench | 27.1% | 23.5% |
| TAU-bench v2 | 23.4% | 0.0% |
| TerminalBench Hard | 0.8% | 3.8% |
Key Takeaways
Nemotron Nano 9B V2 (Non-reasoning) offers the best value at $0.05/1M, making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
Nemotron Nano 9B V2 (Non-reasoning) has the strongest reasoning profile with a 39.5 reasoning score, combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
Phi-4 reaches a 11.2 coding index, making it the top choice for software development and code generation tasks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens, suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
Nemotron Nano 9B V2 (Non-reasoning)
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
Phi-4
- Code generation
- Software development
