Model Comparison
o1
vs. Claude Fable 5.1 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Default Fallback)
Comparing 2 AI models · 0 benchmarks · OpenAI, Anthropic
Recommended Pick
AnClaude Fable 5.1 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Default Fallback)7 metric winsStrongest on: Value, Input price, Output price
Best Value
Claude Fable 5.1 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Default Fallback)
100.0 value score
53.4 reasoning / $20.00/1M
Lowest Price
Claude Fable 5.1 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Default Fallback)
$10.00/1M input price
Best Reasoning
Claude Fable 5.1 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Default Fallback)
53.4 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Best for Coding
Claude Fable 5.1 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Default Fallback)
81.6 coding index
Differences That Matter
Best value
Claude Fable 5.1 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Default Fallback) has the strongest quality-to-price mix at 100.0 out of 100 value points.
Price gap
Claude Fable 5.1 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Default Fallback) is 1.5x cheaper on input tokens than o1.
Reasoning gap
Claude Fable 5.1 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Default Fallback) leads o1 by 38.2 points on reasoning.
Coding gap
Claude Fable 5.1 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Default Fallback) leads o1 by 41.9 points on coding.
Top-pick rationale
Claude Fable 5.1 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Default Fallback) wins 7 measurable categories, including Value, Input price, Output price, Blended price.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
o1
OpenAI
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Claude Fable 5.1 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Default Fallback)
Anthropic
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Secure AI Chat made in Europe
Use Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini alongside with EU-Hosted Models like Deepseek, Qwen & Kimi.
EU-hosted inference
Servers in Germany & Finland. Designed to meet strict GDPR and ISO 27001 compliance requirements.
Full Comparison
| Metric | Op o1 | Top Pick An Claude Fable 5.1 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Default Fallback) |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $15.00/1M | $10.00/1M |
| Output Cost | $60.00/1M | $50.00/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | $26.25/1M | $20.00/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | OpenAI | Anthropic |
| Release Date | Dec 5, 2024 | Sep 1, 2026 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | — | 65.8 tok/s |
| TTFT | — | 268140ms |
| Latency | — | 268140ms |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | 21.7 | 100.0 |
| Reasoning Score | 15.2 | 53.4 |
| Intelligence | 15.2 | 53.4 |
| Coding | 39.7 | 81.6 |
Key Takeaways
Claude Fable 5.1 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Default Fallback) offers the best value at $10.00/1M,making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
Claude Fable 5.1 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Default Fallback) has the strongest reasoning profile with a 53.4 reasoning score,combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
Claude Fable 5.1 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Default Fallback) reaches a 81.6 coding index,making it the top choice for software development and code generation tasks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens,suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
o1
- General-purpose AI
- Versatile applications
Claude Fable 5.1 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Default Fallback)
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
- Code generation
- Software development
