Model Comparison
o3-mini
vs. 105B (high)
Comparing 2 AI models · 11 benchmarks · OpenAI, Sarvam
Recommended Pick
Opo3-mini7 metric winsStrongest on: Throughput, Latency, Reasoning
Best Value
105B (high)
100.0 value score
31.9 reasoning / $0.07/1M
Lowest Price
105B (high)
$0.04/1M input price
Best Reasoning
o3-mini
55.4 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Composite Indices
Higher is better; speed and price are normalized
Standard Benchmarks
Only benchmarks with data are shown
Differences That Matter
Best value
105B (high) has the strongest quality-to-price mix at 100.0 out of 100 value points.
Price gap
105B (high) is 26.2x cheaper on input tokens than o3-mini.
Speed gap
o3-mini generates about 2.0x as many tokens per second as 105B (high).
Reasoning gap
o3-mini leads 105B (high) by 23.4 points on reasoning.
Top-pick rationale
o3-mini wins 7 measurable categories, including Throughput, Latency, Reasoning, Intelligence.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
o3-mini
OpenAI
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
105B (high)
Sarvam
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Chat with leading AI models
Use Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini alongside with EU-Hosted Models like Deepseek, Qwen & Kimi.
EU-hosted inference
Servers in Germany & Finland. Designed to meet strict GDPR and ISO 27001 compliance requirements.
Full Comparison
| Metric | Top Pick Op o3-mini | Sa 105B (high) |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $1.10/1M | $0.04/1M |
| Output Cost | $4.40/1M | $0.17/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | $1.93/1M | $0.07/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | OpenAI | Sarvam |
| Release Date | Jan 31, 2025 | Mar 6, 2026 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | 224.2 tok/s | 111.3 tok/s |
| TTFT | 5719ms | 1170ms |
| Latency | 5719ms | 19140ms |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | 6.7 | 100.0 |
| Reasoning Score | 55.4 | 31.9 |
| Intelligence | 19.0 | 11.9 |
| Standard Benchmarks | ||
| GPQA | 74.8% | 73.8% |
| MMLU Pro | 79.1% | — |
| HLE | 8.7% | 10.1% |
| LiveCodeBench | 71.7% | — |
| MATH 500 | 97.3% | — |
| AIME (Original) | 77.0% | — |
| SciCode | 39.9% | 26.4% |
| LCR | — | 0.0% |
| IFBench | — | 34.4% |
| TAU-bench v2 | 28.7% | 46.8% |
| TerminalBench Hard | 6.8% | 1.5% |
Key Takeaways
105B (high) offers the best value at $0.04/1M,making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
o3-mini has the strongest reasoning profile with a 55.4 reasoning score,combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens,suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
o3-mini
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
105B (high)
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
