Model Comparison
o3-mini (high)
vs. Seed-OSS-36B-Instruct
Comparing 2 AI models · 12 benchmarks · OpenAI, ByteDance Seed
Recommended Pick
BySeed-OSS-36B-Instruct11 metric winsStrongest on: Value, Input price, Output price
Best Value
Seed-OSS-36B-Instruct
100.0 value score
53.9 reasoning / $0.30/1M
Lowest Price
Seed-OSS-36B-Instruct
$0.21/1M input price
Best Reasoning
o3-mini (high)
57.9 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Best for Coding
o3-mini (high)
16.3 coding index
Composite Indices
Higher is better; speed and price are normalized
Standard Benchmarks
Only benchmarks with data are shown
Differences That Matter
Best value
Seed-OSS-36B-Instruct has the strongest quality-to-price mix at 100.0 out of 100 value points.
Price gap
Seed-OSS-36B-Instruct is 5.2x cheaper on input tokens than o3-mini (high).
Speed gap
o3-mini (high) generates about 6.3x as many tokens per second as Seed-OSS-36B-Instruct.
Reasoning gap
o3-mini (high) leads Seed-OSS-36B-Instruct by 4.1 points on reasoning.
Top-pick rationale
Seed-OSS-36B-Instruct wins 11 measurable categories, including Value, Input price, Output price, Blended price.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
o3-mini (high)
OpenAI
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Seed-OSS-36B-Instruct
ByteDance Seed
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Chat with leading AI models
Use Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini alongside with EU-Hosted Models like Deepseek, Qwen & Kimi.
EU-hosted inference
Servers in Germany & Finland. Designed to meet strict GDPR and ISO 27001 compliance requirements.
Full Comparison
| Metric | Op o3-mini (high) | Top Pick By Seed-OSS-36B-Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $1.10/1M | $0.21/1M |
| Output Cost | $4.40/1M | $0.57/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | $1.93/1M | $0.30/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | OpenAI | ByteDance Seed |
| Release Date | Jan 31, 2025 | Aug 20, 2025 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | 229.1 tok/s | 36.5 tok/s |
| TTFT | 17153ms | 1491ms |
| Latency | 17153ms | 56289ms |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | 16.8 | 100.0 |
| Reasoning Score | 57.9 | 53.9 |
| Intelligence | 15.6 | 18.3 |
| Coding | 16.3 | — |
| Math | — | 84.7 |
| Standard Benchmarks | ||
| GPQA | 77.3% | 72.6% |
| MMLU Pro | 80.2% | 81.5% |
| HLE | 12.3% | 9.1% |
| LiveCodeBench | 73.4% | 76.5% |
| MATH 500 | 98.5% | — |
| AIME 2025 | — | 84.7% |
| AIME (Original) | 86.0% | — |
| SciCode | 39.8% | 36.5% |
| LCR | 39.3% | 57.7% |
| IFBench | 67.1% | 41.9% |
| TAU-bench v2 | 31.3% | 49.4% |
| TerminalBench Hard | 6.1% | 6.8% |
Key Takeaways
Seed-OSS-36B-Instruct offers the best value at $0.21/1M,making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
o3-mini (high) has the strongest reasoning profile with a 57.9 reasoning score,combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
o3-mini (high) reaches a 16.3 coding index,making it the top choice for software development and code generation tasks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens,suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
o3-mini (high)
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
- Code generation
- Software development
Seed-OSS-36B-Instruct
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
