Model Comparison
o3-pro
vs. Qwen3 30B A3B (Non-reasoning)
Comparing 2 AI models · 12 benchmarks · OpenAI, Alibaba
Recommended Pick
AlQwen3 30B A3B (Non-reasoning)7 metric winsStrongest on: Value, Input price, Output price
Best Value
Qwen3 30B A3B (Non-reasoning)
100.0 value score
31.2 reasoning / $0.35/1M
Lowest Price
Qwen3 30B A3B (Non-reasoning)
$0.20/1M input price
Best Reasoning
o3-pro
58.5 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Composite Indices
Higher is better; speed and price are normalized
Standard Benchmarks
Only benchmarks with data are shown
Differences That Matter
Best value
Qwen3 30B A3B (Non-reasoning) has the strongest quality-to-price mix at 100.0 out of 100 value points.
Price gap
Qwen3 30B A3B (Non-reasoning) is 100x cheaper on input tokens than o3-pro.
Speed gap
Qwen3 30B A3B (Non-reasoning) generates about 4.9x as many tokens per second as o3-pro.
Reasoning gap
o3-pro leads Qwen3 30B A3B (Non-reasoning) by 27.3 points on reasoning.
Top-pick rationale
Qwen3 30B A3B (Non-reasoning) wins 7 measurable categories, including Value, Input price, Output price, Blended price.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
o3-pro
OpenAI
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Qwen3 30B A3B (Non-reasoning)
Alibaba
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Chat with leading AI models
Use Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini alongside with EU-Hosted Models like Deepseek, Qwen & Kimi.
EU-hosted inference
Servers in Germany & Finland. Designed to meet strict GDPR and ISO 27001 compliance requirements.
Full Comparison
| Metric | Op o3-pro | Top Pick Al Qwen3 30B A3B (Non-reasoning) |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $20.00/1M | $0.20/1M |
| Output Cost | $80.00/1M | $0.80/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | $35.00/1M | $0.35/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | OpenAI | Alibaba |
| Release Date | Jun 10, 2025 | Apr 28, 2025 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | 23.6 tok/s | 116.0 tok/s |
| TTFT | 72569ms | 1076ms |
| Latency | 72569ms | 1076ms |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | 1.9 | 100.0 |
| Reasoning Score | 58.5 | 31.2 |
| Intelligence | 32.5 | 6.8 |
| Math | — | 21.7 |
| Standard Benchmarks | ||
| GPQA | 84.5% | 51.5% |
| MMLU Pro | — | 71.0% |
| HLE | — | 4.6% |
| LiveCodeBench | — | 32.2% |
| MATH 500 | — | 86.3% |
| AIME 2025 | — | 21.7% |
| AIME (Original) | — | 26.0% |
| SciCode | — | 26.4% |
| LCR | — | 0.0% |
| IFBench | — | 31.9% |
| TAU-bench v2 | — | 22.2% |
| TerminalBench Hard | — | 6.8% |
Key Takeaways
Qwen3 30B A3B (Non-reasoning) offers the best value at $0.20/1M,making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
o3-pro has the strongest reasoning profile with a 58.5 reasoning score,combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens,suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
o3-pro
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
Qwen3 30B A3B (Non-reasoning)
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
