Model Comparison
o3-pro
vs. Qwen3.5 2B (Non-reasoning)
Comparing 2 AI models · 7 benchmarks · OpenAI, Alibaba
Recommended Pick
Opo3-pro4 metric winsStrongest on: Throughput, Reasoning, Intelligence
Lowest Price
Qwen3.5 2B (Non-reasoning)
$0.00/1M input price
Best Reasoning
o3-pro
58.5 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Best for Coding
Qwen3.5 2B (Non-reasoning)
2.4 coding index
Composite Indices
Higher is better; speed and price are normalized
Standard Benchmarks
Only benchmarks with data are shown
Differences That Matter
Price gap
Qwen3.5 2B (Non-reasoning) is ∞x cheaper on input tokens than o3-pro.
Reasoning gap
o3-pro leads Qwen3.5 2B (Non-reasoning) by 40.4 points on reasoning.
Top-pick rationale
o3-pro wins 4 measurable categories, including Throughput, Reasoning, Intelligence, GPQA.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
o3-pro
OpenAI
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Qwen3.5 2B (Non-reasoning)
Alibaba
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Chat with leading AI models
Use Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini alongside with EU-Hosted Models like Deepseek, Qwen & Kimi.
EU-hosted inference
Servers in Germany & Finland. Designed to meet strict GDPR and ISO 27001 compliance requirements.
Full Comparison
| Metric | Top Pick Op o3-pro | Al Qwen3.5 2B (Non-reasoning) |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $20.00/1M | $0.00/1M |
| Output Cost | $80.00/1M | $0.00/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | $35.00/1M | — |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | OpenAI | Alibaba |
| Release Date | Jun 10, 2025 | Mar 2, 2026 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | 23.6 tok/s | — |
| TTFT | 72569ms | — |
| Latency | 72569ms | — |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | 100.0 | — |
| Reasoning Score | 58.5 | 18.1 |
| Intelligence | 32.5 | 5.6 |
| Coding | — | 2.4 |
| Standard Benchmarks | ||
| GPQA | 84.5% | 43.8% |
| HLE | — | 4.9% |
| SciCode | — | 7.2% |
| LCR | — | 13.7% |
| IFBench | — | 29.1% |
| TAU-bench v2 | — | 81.6% |
| TerminalBench Hard | — | 3.8% |
Key Takeaways
Qwen3.5 2B (Non-reasoning) offers the best value at $0.00/1M,making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
o3-pro has the strongest reasoning profile with a 58.5 reasoning score,combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
Qwen3.5 2B (Non-reasoning) reaches a 2.4 coding index,making it the top choice for software development and code generation tasks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens,suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
o3-pro
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
Qwen3.5 2B (Non-reasoning)
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
- Code generation
- Software development
