Model Comparison
o3-pro
vs. Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Reasoning)
Comparing 2 AI models · 7 benchmarks · OpenAI, Alibaba
Recommended Pick
AlQwen3.5 397B A17B (Reasoning)9 metric winsStrongest on: Value, Input price, Output price
Best Value
Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Reasoning)
100.0 value score
50.1 reasoning / $1.35/1M
Lowest Price
Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Reasoning)
$0.60/1M input price
Best Reasoning
o3-pro
58.5 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Best for Coding
Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Reasoning)
48.2 coding index
Composite Indices
Higher is better; speed and price are normalized
Standard Benchmarks
Only benchmarks with data are shown
Differences That Matter
Best value
Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Reasoning) has the strongest quality-to-price mix at 100.0 out of 100 value points.
Price gap
Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Reasoning) is 33.3x cheaper on input tokens than o3-pro.
Speed gap
Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Reasoning) generates about 2.5x as many tokens per second as o3-pro.
Reasoning gap
o3-pro leads Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Reasoning) by 8.4 points on reasoning.
Top-pick rationale
Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Reasoning) wins 9 measurable categories, including Value, Input price, Output price, Blended price.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
o3-pro
OpenAI
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Reasoning)
Alibaba
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Chat with leading AI models
Use Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini alongside with EU-Hosted Models like Deepseek, Qwen & Kimi.
EU-hosted inference
Servers in Germany & Finland. Designed to meet strict GDPR and ISO 27001 compliance requirements.
Full Comparison
| Metric | Op o3-pro | Top Pick Al Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Reasoning) |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $20.00/1M | $0.60/1M |
| Output Cost | $80.00/1M | $3.60/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | $35.00/1M | $1.35/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | OpenAI | Alibaba |
| Release Date | Jun 10, 2025 | Feb 16, 2026 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | 24.2 tok/s | 61.1 tok/s |
| TTFT | 67437ms | 1795ms |
| Latency | 67437ms | 53924ms |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | 4.5 | 100.0 |
| Reasoning Score | 58.5 | 50.1 |
| Intelligence | 32.5 | 33.7 |
| Coding | — | 48.2 |
| Standard Benchmarks | ||
| GPQA | 84.5% | 89.3% |
| HLE | — | 27.3% |
| SciCode | — | 42.0% |
| LCR | — | 65.7% |
| IFBench | — | 78.8% |
| TAU-bench v2 | — | 95.6% |
| TerminalBench Hard | — | 40.9% |
Key Takeaways
Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Reasoning) offers the best value at $0.60/1M,making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
o3-pro has the strongest reasoning profile with a 58.5 reasoning score,combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Reasoning) reaches a 48.2 coding index,making it the top choice for software development and code generation tasks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens,suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
o3-pro
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Reasoning)
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
- Code generation
- Software development
