Model Comparison
PALM-2
vs. Qwen3 235B A22B (Non-reasoning)
Comparing 2 AI models · 12 benchmarks · Google, Alibaba
Recommended Pick
GoPALM-24 metric winsStrongest on: Input price, Output price, TTFT
Lowest Price
PALM-2
$0.00/1M input price
Best Reasoning
Qwen3 235B A22B (Non-reasoning)
35.3 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Best for Coding
PALM-2
4.6 coding index
Composite Indices
Higher is better; speed and price are normalized
Standard Benchmarks
Only benchmarks with data are shown
Differences That Matter
Price gap
PALM-2 is ∞x cheaper on input tokens than Qwen3 235B A22B (Non-reasoning).
Reasoning gap
Qwen3 235B A22B (Non-reasoning) leads PALM-2 by 32.1 points on reasoning.
Top-pick rationale
PALM-2 wins 4 measurable categories, including Input price, Output price, TTFT, Latency.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
PALM-2
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Qwen3 235B A22B (Non-reasoning)
Alibaba
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Chat with leading AI models
Use Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini alongside with EU-Hosted Models like Deepseek, Qwen & Kimi.
EU-hosted inference
Servers in Germany & Finland. Designed to meet strict GDPR and ISO 27001 compliance requirements.
Full Comparison
| Metric | Top Pick Go PALM-2 | Al Qwen3 235B A22B (Non-reasoning) |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $0.00/1M | $0.70/1M |
| Output Cost | $0.00/1M | $2.80/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | — | $1.22/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | Alibaba | |
| Release Date | May 10, 2023 | Apr 28, 2025 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | — | 65.1 tok/s |
| TTFT | — | 1236ms |
| Latency | — | 1236ms |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | — | 100.0 |
| Reasoning Score | 3.2 | 35.3 |
| Intelligence | 3.2 | 10.9 |
| Coding | 4.6 | — |
| Math | — | 23.7 |
| Standard Benchmarks | ||
| GPQA | — | 61.3% |
| MMLU Pro | — | 76.2% |
| HLE | — | 4.7% |
| LiveCodeBench | — | 34.3% |
| MATH 500 | — | 90.2% |
| AIME 2025 | — | 23.7% |
| AIME (Original) | — | 32.7% |
| SciCode | — | 29.9% |
| LCR | — | 0.0% |
| IFBench | — | 36.6% |
| TAU-bench v2 | — | 27.2% |
| TerminalBench Hard | — | 6.1% |
Key Takeaways
PALM-2 offers the best value at $0.00/1M,making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
Qwen3 235B A22B (Non-reasoning) has the strongest reasoning profile with a 35.3 reasoning score,combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
PALM-2 reaches a 4.6 coding index,making it the top choice for software development and code generation tasks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens,suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
PALM-2
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
- Code generation
- Software development
Qwen3 235B A22B (Non-reasoning)
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
