Model Comparison
Qwen2.5 Turbo
vs. QwQ 32B
Comparing 2 AI models · 10 benchmarks · Alibaba
Recommended Pick
AlQwQ 32B10 metric winsStrongest on: TTFT, Reasoning, Intelligence
Best Value
Qwen2.5 Turbo
100.0 value score
28.8 reasoning / $0.09/1M
Lowest Price
Qwen2.5 Turbo
$0.05/1M input price
Best Reasoning
QwQ 32B
44.7 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Composite Indices
Higher is better; speed and price are normalized
Standard Benchmarks
Only benchmarks with data are shown
Differences That Matter
Best value
Qwen2.5 Turbo has the strongest quality-to-price mix at 100.0 out of 100 value points.
Price gap
Qwen2.5 Turbo is 13.2x cheaper on input tokens than QwQ 32B.
Speed gap
Qwen2.5 Turbo generates about 3.5x as many tokens per second as QwQ 32B.
Reasoning gap
QwQ 32B leads Qwen2.5 Turbo by 15.9 points on reasoning.
Top-pick rationale
QwQ 32B wins 10 measurable categories, including TTFT, Reasoning, Intelligence, GPQA.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
Qwen2.5 Turbo
Alibaba
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
QwQ 32B
Alibaba
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Chat with leading AI models
Use Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini alongside with EU-Hosted Models like Deepseek, Qwen & Kimi.
EU-hosted inference
Servers in Germany & Finland. Designed to meet strict GDPR and ISO 27001 compliance requirements.
Full Comparison
| Metric | Al Qwen2.5 Turbo | Top Pick Al QwQ 32B |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $0.05/1M | $0.66/1M |
| Output Cost | $0.20/1M | $1.00/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.09/1M | $0.74/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | Alibaba | Alibaba |
| Release Date | Nov 18, 2024 | Mar 5, 2025 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | 114.3 tok/s | 32.7 tok/s |
| TTFT | 1062ms | 473ms |
| Latency | 1062ms | 76591ms |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | 100.0 | 18.2 |
| Reasoning Score | 28.8 | 44.7 |
| Intelligence | 6.3 | 13.4 |
| Math | — | 29.0 |
| Standard Benchmarks | ||
| GPQA | 41.0% | 59.3% |
| MMLU Pro | 63.3% | 76.4% |
| HLE | 4.2% | 8.2% |
| LiveCodeBench | 16.3% | 63.1% |
| MATH 500 | 80.5% | 95.7% |
| AIME 2025 | — | 29.0% |
| AIME (Original) | 12.0% | 78.0% |
| SciCode | 15.3% | 35.8% |
| LCR | — | 25.0% |
| IFBench | — | 38.8% |
Key Takeaways
Qwen2.5 Turbo offers the best value at $0.05/1M,making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
QwQ 32B has the strongest reasoning profile with a 44.7 reasoning score,combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens,suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
Qwen2.5 Turbo
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
QwQ 32B
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
