Model Comparison
Qwen2.5 Coder Instruct 32B
vs. Qwen3.5 27B (Non-reasoning)
Comparing 2 AI models · 11 benchmarks · Alibaba
Recommended Pick
Al Qwen3.5 27B (Non-reasoning) 6 metric wins Strongest on: Throughput, Reasoning, Intelligence
Lowest Price
Qwen2.5 Coder Instruct 32B
$0.00/1M input price
Best Reasoning
Qwen3.5 27B (Non-reasoning)
44.9 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Best for Coding
Qwen3.5 27B (Non-reasoning)
33.4 coding index
Composite Indices
Higher is better; speed and price are normalized
Standard Benchmarks
Only benchmarks with data are shown
Differences That Matter
Price gap
Qwen2.5 Coder Instruct 32B is ∞x cheaper on input tokens than Qwen3.5 27B (Non-reasoning).
Reasoning gap
Qwen3.5 27B (Non-reasoning) leads Qwen2.5 Coder Instruct 32B by 15.5 points on reasoning.
Top-pick rationale
Qwen3.5 27B (Non-reasoning) wins 6 measurable categories, including Throughput, Reasoning, Intelligence, GPQA.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
Qwen2.5 Coder Instruct 32B
Alibaba
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Qwen3.5 27B (Non-reasoning)
Alibaba
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Full Comparison
| Metric | Al Qwen2.5 Coder Instruct 32B | Top Pick Al Qwen3.5 27B (Non-reasoning) |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $0.00/1M | $0.30/1M |
| Output Cost | $0.00/1M | $2.60/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | — | $0.88/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | Alibaba | Alibaba |
| Release Date | Nov 11, 2024 | Feb 24, 2026 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | — | 92.0 tok/s |
| TTFT | — | 1424ms |
| Latency | — | 1424ms |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | — | 100.0 |
| Reasoning Score | 29.4 | 44.9 |
| Intelligence | 12.9 | 37.2 |
| Coding | — | 33.4 |
| Standard Benchmarks | ||
| GPQA | 41.7% | 84.2% |
| MMLU Pro | 63.5% | — |
| HLE | 3.8% | 13.2% |
| LiveCodeBench | 29.5% | — |
| MATH 500 | 76.7% | — |
| AIME (Original) | 12.0% | — |
| SciCode | 27.1% | 36.7% |
| LCR | — | 55.7% |
| IFBench | — | 46.9% |
| TAU-bench v2 | — | 87.1% |
| TerminalBench Hard | — | 31.8% |
Key Takeaways
Qwen2.5 Coder Instruct 32B offers the best value at $0.00/1M, making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
Qwen3.5 27B (Non-reasoning) has the strongest reasoning profile with a 44.9 reasoning score, combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
Qwen3.5 27B (Non-reasoning) reaches a 33.4 coding index, making it the top choice for software development and code generation tasks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens, suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
Qwen2.5 Coder Instruct 32B
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
Qwen3.5 27B (Non-reasoning)
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
- Code generation
- Software development
