Model Comparison
Qwen3 14B (Non-reasoning)
vs. Step3 VL 10B
Comparing 2 AI models · 12 benchmarks · Alibaba, StepFun
Recommended Pick
StStep3 VL 10B9 metric winsStrongest on: Input price, Output price, TTFT
Lowest Price
Step3 VL 10B
$0.00/1M input price
Best Reasoning
Qwen3 14B (Non-reasoning)
41.3 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Composite Indices
Higher is better; speed and price are normalized
Standard Benchmarks
Only benchmarks with data are shown
Differences That Matter
Price gap
Step3 VL 10B is ∞x cheaper on input tokens than Qwen3 14B (Non-reasoning).
Reasoning gap
Qwen3 14B (Non-reasoning) leads Step3 VL 10B by 11.8 points on reasoning.
Top-pick rationale
Step3 VL 10B wins 9 measurable categories, including Input price, Output price, TTFT, Latency.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
Qwen3 14B (Non-reasoning)
Alibaba
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Step3 VL 10B
StepFun
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Chat with leading AI models
Use Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini alongside with EU-Hosted Models like Deepseek, Qwen & Kimi.
EU-hosted inference
Servers in Germany & Finland. Designed to meet strict GDPR and ISO 27001 compliance requirements.
Full Comparison
| Metric | Al Qwen3 14B (Non-reasoning) | Top Pick St Step3 VL 10B |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $0.35/1M | $0.00/1M |
| Output Cost | $1.40/1M | $0.00/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.61/1M | — |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | Alibaba | StepFun |
| Release Date | Apr 28, 2025 | Jan 20, 2026 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | 63.3 tok/s | — |
| TTFT | 1081ms | — |
| Latency | 1081ms | — |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | 100.0 | — |
| Reasoning Score | 41.3 | 29.6 |
| Intelligence | 7.0 | 9.5 |
| Math | 58.0 | — |
| Standard Benchmarks | ||
| GPQA | 47.0% | 69.0% |
| MMLU Pro | 67.5% | — |
| HLE | 4.2% | 10.2% |
| LiveCodeBench | 28.0% | — |
| MATH 500 | 87.1% | — |
| AIME 2025 | 58.0% | — |
| AIME (Original) | 28.0% | — |
| SciCode | 26.5% | 31.1% |
| LCR | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| IFBench | 23.9% | 50.2% |
| TAU-bench v2 | 32.2% | 16.1% |
| TerminalBench Hard | 5.3% | 5.3% |
Key Takeaways
Step3 VL 10B offers the best value at $0.00/1M,making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
Qwen3 14B (Non-reasoning) has the strongest reasoning profile with a 41.3 reasoning score,combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens,suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
Qwen3 14B (Non-reasoning)
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
Step3 VL 10B
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
