Model Comparison
Qwen3 14B (Reasoning)
vs. Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Reasoning)
Comparing 2 AI models · 12 benchmarks · Alibaba
Recommended Pick
AlQwen3.5 397B A17B (Reasoning)10 metric winsStrongest on: Output price, Intelligence, Coding
Best Value
Qwen3 14B (Reasoning)
100.0 value score
51.3 reasoning / $1.31/1M
Lowest Price
Qwen3 14B (Reasoning)
$0.35/1M input price
Best Reasoning
Qwen3 14B (Reasoning)
51.3 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Best for Coding
Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Reasoning)
48.2 coding index
Composite Indices
Higher is better; speed and price are normalized
Standard Benchmarks
Only benchmarks with data are shown
Differences That Matter
Best value
Qwen3 14B (Reasoning) has the strongest quality-to-price mix at 100.0 out of 100 value points.
Price gap
Qwen3 14B (Reasoning) is 1.7x cheaper on input tokens than Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Reasoning).
Reasoning gap
Qwen3 14B (Reasoning) leads Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Reasoning) by 1.2 points on reasoning.
Coding gap
Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Reasoning) leads Qwen3 14B (Reasoning) by 34.4 points on coding.
Top-pick rationale
Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Reasoning) wins 10 measurable categories, including Output price, Intelligence, Coding, GPQA.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
Qwen3 14B (Reasoning)
Alibaba
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Reasoning)
Alibaba
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Chat with leading AI models
Use Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini alongside with EU-Hosted Models like Deepseek, Qwen & Kimi.
EU-hosted inference
Servers in Germany & Finland. Designed to meet strict GDPR and ISO 27001 compliance requirements.
Full Comparison
| Metric | Al Qwen3 14B (Reasoning) | Top Pick Al Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Reasoning) |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $0.35/1M | $0.60/1M |
| Output Cost | $4.20/1M | $3.60/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | $1.31/1M | $1.35/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | Alibaba | Alibaba |
| Release Date | Apr 28, 2025 | Feb 16, 2026 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | 63.0 tok/s | 61.0 tok/s |
| TTFT | 1093ms | 1795ms |
| Latency | 32824ms | 54043ms |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | 100.0 | 95.0 |
| Reasoning Score | 51.3 | 50.1 |
| Intelligence | 10.4 | 33.7 |
| Coding | 13.8 | 48.2 |
| Math | 55.7 | — |
| Standard Benchmarks | ||
| GPQA | 60.4% | 89.3% |
| MMLU Pro | 77.4% | — |
| HLE | 4.3% | 27.3% |
| LiveCodeBench | 52.3% | — |
| MATH 500 | 96.1% | — |
| AIME 2025 | 55.7% | — |
| AIME (Original) | 76.3% | — |
| SciCode | 31.6% | 42.0% |
| LCR | 0.0% | 65.7% |
| IFBench | 40.5% | 78.8% |
| TAU-bench v2 | 34.5% | 95.6% |
| TerminalBench Hard | 3.8% | 40.9% |
Key Takeaways
Qwen3 14B (Reasoning) offers the best value at $0.35/1M,making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
Qwen3 14B (Reasoning) has the strongest reasoning profile with a 51.3 reasoning score,combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Reasoning) reaches a 48.2 coding index,making it the top choice for software development and code generation tasks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens,suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
Qwen3 14B (Reasoning)
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Reasoning)
- Code generation
- Software development
