Model Comparison
Qwen3 235B A22B (Reasoning)
vs. Qwen3.6 Max Preview
Comparing 2 AI models · 12 benchmarks · Alibaba
Recommended Pick
Al Qwen3.6 Max Preview 10 metric wins Strongest on: Output price, Intelligence, Coding
Best Value
Qwen3 235B A22B (Reasoning)
100.0 value score
63.2 reasoning / $2.63/1M
Lowest Price
Qwen3 235B A22B (Reasoning)
$0.70/1M input price
Best Reasoning
Qwen3 235B A22B (Reasoning)
63.2 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Best for Coding
Qwen3.6 Max Preview
44.9 coding index
Composite Indices
Higher is better; speed and price are normalized
Standard Benchmarks
Only benchmarks with data are shown
Differences That Matter
Best value
Qwen3 235B A22B (Reasoning) has the strongest quality-to-price mix at 100.0 out of 100 value points.
Price gap
Qwen3 235B A22B (Reasoning) is 1.9x cheaper on input tokens than Qwen3.6 Max Preview.
Speed gap
Qwen3 235B A22B (Reasoning) generates about 1.5x as many tokens per second as Qwen3.6 Max Preview.
Reasoning gap
Qwen3 235B A22B (Reasoning) leads Qwen3.6 Max Preview by 6.7 points on reasoning.
Coding gap
Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads Qwen3 235B A22B (Reasoning) by 27.5 points on coding.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
Qwen3 235B A22B (Reasoning)
Alibaba
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Qwen3.6 Max Preview
Alibaba
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Full Comparison
| Metric | Al Qwen3 235B A22B (Reasoning) | Top Pick Al Qwen3.6 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $0.70/1M | $1.30/1M |
| Output Cost | $8.40/1M | $7.80/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | $2.63/1M | $2.92/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | Alibaba | Alibaba |
| Release Date | Apr 28, 2025 | Apr 20, 2026 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | 61.5 tok/s | 41.1 tok/s |
| TTFT | 1231ms | 1972ms |
| Latency | 33732ms | 50641ms |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | 100.0 | 80.2 |
| Reasoning Score | 63.2 | 56.5 |
| Intelligence | 19.8 | 51.8 |
| Coding | 17.4 | 44.9 |
| Math | 82.0 | — |
| Standard Benchmarks | ||
| GPQA | 70.0% | 88.8% |
| MMLU Pro | 82.8% | — |
| HLE | 11.7% | 28.9% |
| LiveCodeBench | 62.2% | — |
| MATH 500 | 93.0% | — |
| AIME 2025 | 82.0% | — |
| AIME (Original) | 84.0% | — |
| SciCode | 39.9% | 46.9% |
| LCR | 0.0% | 69.7% |
| IFBench | 38.7% | 76.6% |
| TAU-bench v2 | 24.0% | 95.9% |
| TerminalBench Hard | 6.1% | 43.9% |
Key Takeaways
Qwen3 235B A22B (Reasoning) offers the best value at $0.70/1M, making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
Qwen3 235B A22B (Reasoning) has the strongest reasoning profile with a 63.2 reasoning score, combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
Qwen3.6 Max Preview reaches a 44.9 coding index, making it the top choice for software development and code generation tasks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens, suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
Qwen3 235B A22B (Reasoning)
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
Qwen3.6 Max Preview
- Code generation
- Software development
