Model Comparison
Qwen3 30B A3B (Non-reasoning)
vs. Solar Open 100B (Reasoning)
Comparing 2 AI models · 12 benchmarks · Alibaba, Upstage
Recommended Pick
UpSolar Open 100B (Reasoning)11 metric winsStrongest on: Input price, Output price, TTFT
Lowest Price
Solar Open 100B (Reasoning)
$0.00/1M input price
Best Reasoning
Qwen3 30B A3B (Non-reasoning)
31.2 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Composite Indices
Higher is better; speed and price are normalized
Standard Benchmarks
Only benchmarks with data are shown
Differences That Matter
Price gap
Solar Open 100B (Reasoning) is ∞x cheaper on input tokens than Qwen3 30B A3B (Non-reasoning).
Reasoning gap
Qwen3 30B A3B (Non-reasoning) leads Solar Open 100B (Reasoning) by 1.2 points on reasoning.
Top-pick rationale
Solar Open 100B (Reasoning) wins 11 measurable categories, including Input price, Output price, TTFT, Latency.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
Qwen3 30B A3B (Non-reasoning)
Alibaba
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Solar Open 100B (Reasoning)
Upstage
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Chat with leading AI models
Use Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini alongside with EU-Hosted Models like Deepseek, Qwen & Kimi.
EU-hosted inference
Servers in Germany & Finland. Designed to meet strict GDPR and ISO 27001 compliance requirements.
Full Comparison
| Metric | Al Qwen3 30B A3B (Non-reasoning) | Top Pick Up Solar Open 100B (Reasoning) |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $0.20/1M | $0.00/1M |
| Output Cost | $0.80/1M | $0.00/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.35/1M | — |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | Alibaba | Upstage |
| Release Date | Apr 28, 2025 | Dec 17, 2025 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | 112.0 tok/s | — |
| TTFT | 1046ms | — |
| Latency | 1046ms | — |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | 100.0 | — |
| Reasoning Score | 31.2 | 30.0 |
| Intelligence | 6.8 | 15.1 |
| Math | 21.7 | — |
| Standard Benchmarks | ||
| GPQA | 51.5% | 65.7% |
| MMLU Pro | 71.0% | — |
| HLE | 4.6% | 9.2% |
| LiveCodeBench | 32.2% | — |
| MATH 500 | 86.3% | — |
| AIME 2025 | 21.7% | — |
| AIME (Original) | 26.0% | — |
| SciCode | 26.4% | 26.9% |
| LCR | 0.0% | 36.0% |
| IFBench | 31.9% | 57.7% |
| TAU-bench v2 | 22.2% | 48.2% |
| TerminalBench Hard | 6.8% | 2.3% |
Key Takeaways
Solar Open 100B (Reasoning) offers the best value at $0.00/1M,making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
Qwen3 30B A3B (Non-reasoning) has the strongest reasoning profile with a 31.2 reasoning score,combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens,suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
Qwen3 30B A3B (Non-reasoning)
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
Solar Open 100B (Reasoning)
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
