Model Comparison
Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning)
vs. Qwen3 Max Thinking (Preview)
Comparing 2 AI models · 10 benchmarks · Alibaba
Recommended Pick
AlQwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning)15 metric winsStrongest on: Value, Input price, Output price
Best Value
Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning)
100.0 value score
47.1 reasoning / $1.10/1M
Lowest Price
Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning)
$0.40/1M input price
Best Reasoning
Qwen3 Max Thinking (Preview)
55.8 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Best for Coding
Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning)
45.7 coding index
Composite Indices
Higher is better; speed and price are normalized
Standard Benchmarks
Only benchmarks with data are shown
Differences That Matter
Best value
Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning) has the strongest quality-to-price mix at 100.0 out of 100 value points.
Price gap
Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning) is 3.0x cheaper on input tokens than Qwen3 Max Thinking (Preview).
Speed gap
Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning) generates about 2.4x as many tokens per second as Qwen3 Max Thinking (Preview).
Reasoning gap
Qwen3 Max Thinking (Preview) leads Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning) by 8.7 points on reasoning.
Top-pick rationale
Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning) wins 15 measurable categories, including Value, Input price, Output price, Blended price.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning)
Alibaba
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Qwen3 Max Thinking (Preview)
Alibaba
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Chat with leading AI models
Use Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini alongside with EU-Hosted Models like Deepseek, Qwen & Kimi.
EU-hosted inference
Servers in Germany & Finland. Designed to meet strict GDPR and ISO 27001 compliance requirements.
Full Comparison
| Metric | Top Pick Al Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning) | Al Qwen3 Max Thinking (Preview) |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $0.40/1M | $1.20/1M |
| Output Cost | $3.20/1M | $6.00/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | $1.10/1M | $2.40/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | Alibaba | Alibaba |
| Release Date | Feb 24, 2026 | Nov 3, 2025 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | 147.7 tok/s | 61.3 tok/s |
| TTFT | 1043ms | 1829ms |
| Latency | 14584ms | 34474ms |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | 100.0 | 54.3 |
| Reasoning Score | 47.1 | 55.8 |
| Intelligence | 32.3 | 25.0 |
| Coding | 45.7 | — |
| Math | — | 82.3 |
| Standard Benchmarks | ||
| GPQA | 85.7% | 77.6% |
| MMLU Pro | — | 82.4% |
| HLE | 23.4% | 12.0% |
| LiveCodeBench | — | 53.5% |
| AIME 2025 | — | 82.3% |
| SciCode | 42.0% | 38.7% |
| LCR | 66.7% | 57.7% |
| IFBench | 75.7% | 53.8% |
| TAU-bench v2 | 93.6% | 83.6% |
| TerminalBench Hard | 31.1% | 17.4% |
Key Takeaways
Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning) offers the best value at $0.40/1M,making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
Qwen3 Max Thinking (Preview) has the strongest reasoning profile with a 55.8 reasoning score,combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning) reaches a 45.7 coding index,making it the top choice for software development and code generation tasks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens,suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning)
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
- Code generation
- Software development
Qwen3 Max Thinking (Preview)
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
