Model Comparison
Qwen3.5 27B (Non-reasoning)
vs. Tiny Aya Global
Comparing 2 AI models · 7 benchmarks · Alibaba, Cohere
Recommended Pick
AlQwen3.5 27B (Non-reasoning)9 metric winsStrongest on: Reasoning, Intelligence, GPQA
Lowest Price
Tiny Aya Global
$0.00/1M input price
Best Reasoning
Qwen3.5 27B (Non-reasoning)
42.2 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Composite Indices
Higher is better; speed and price are normalized
Standard Benchmarks
Only benchmarks with data are shown
Differences That Matter
Price gap
Tiny Aya Global is ∞x cheaper on input tokens than Qwen3.5 27B (Non-reasoning).
Speed gap
Tiny Aya Global generates about 1.5x as many tokens per second as Qwen3.5 27B (Non-reasoning).
Reasoning gap
Qwen3.5 27B (Non-reasoning) leads Tiny Aya Global by 30.0 points on reasoning.
Top-pick rationale
Qwen3.5 27B (Non-reasoning) wins 9 measurable categories, including Reasoning, Intelligence, GPQA, HLE.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
Qwen3.5 27B (Non-reasoning)
Alibaba
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Tiny Aya Global
Cohere
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Chat with leading AI models
Use Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini alongside with EU-Hosted Models like Deepseek, Qwen & Kimi.
EU-hosted inference
Servers in Germany & Finland. Designed to meet strict GDPR and ISO 27001 compliance requirements.
Full Comparison
| Metric | Top Pick Al Qwen3.5 27B (Non-reasoning) | Co Tiny Aya Global |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $0.30/1M | $0.00/1M |
| Output Cost | $2.40/1M | $0.00/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.82/1M | — |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | Alibaba | Cohere |
| Release Date | Feb 24, 2026 | Feb 17, 2026 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | 92.7 tok/s | 134.8 tok/s |
| TTFT | 1392ms | 292ms |
| Latency | 1392ms | 292ms |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | 100.0 | — |
| Reasoning Score | 42.2 | 12.2 |
| Intelligence | 29.3 | 1.0 |
| Standard Benchmarks | ||
| GPQA | 84.2% | 30.5% |
| HLE | 13.2% | 5.2% |
| SciCode | 36.7% | 3.6% |
| LCR | 55.7% | 0.0% |
| IFBench | 46.9% | 20.1% |
| TAU-bench v2 | 87.1% | 0.0% |
| TerminalBench Hard | 31.8% | 0.0% |
Key Takeaways
Tiny Aya Global offers the best value at $0.00/1M,making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
Qwen3.5 27B (Non-reasoning) has the strongest reasoning profile with a 42.2 reasoning score,combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens,suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
Qwen3.5 27B (Non-reasoning)
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
Tiny Aya Global
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
