Model Comparison
Qwen3.5 2B (Non-reasoning)
vs. Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
Comparing 2 AI models · 10 benchmarks · Alibaba
Recommended Pick
AlQwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct9 metric winsStrongest on: Throughput, Reasoning, Intelligence
Lowest Price
Qwen3.5 2B (Non-reasoning)
$0.00/1M input price
Best Reasoning
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
45.5 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Best for Coding
Qwen3.5 2B (Non-reasoning)
2.4 coding index
Composite Indices
Higher is better; speed and price are normalized
Standard Benchmarks
Only benchmarks with data are shown
Differences That Matter
Price gap
Qwen3.5 2B (Non-reasoning) is ∞x cheaper on input tokens than Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct.
Reasoning gap
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct leads Qwen3.5 2B (Non-reasoning) by 27.4 points on reasoning.
Top-pick rationale
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct wins 9 measurable categories, including Throughput, Reasoning, Intelligence, GPQA.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
Qwen3.5 2B (Non-reasoning)
Alibaba
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
Alibaba
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Chat with leading AI models
Use Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini alongside with EU-Hosted Models like Deepseek, Qwen & Kimi.
EU-hosted inference
Servers in Germany & Finland. Designed to meet strict GDPR and ISO 27001 compliance requirements.
Full Comparison
| Metric | Al Qwen3.5 2B (Non-reasoning) | Top Pick Al Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $0.00/1M | $0.50/1M |
| Output Cost | $0.00/1M | $2.00/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | — | $0.88/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | Alibaba | Alibaba |
| Release Date | Mar 2, 2026 | Sep 11, 2025 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | — | 189.3 tok/s |
| TTFT | — | 1019ms |
| Latency | — | 1019ms |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | — | 100.0 |
| Reasoning Score | 18.1 | 45.5 |
| Intelligence | 5.6 | 13.7 |
| Coding | 2.4 | — |
| Math | — | 66.3 |
| Standard Benchmarks | ||
| GPQA | 43.8% | 73.8% |
| MMLU Pro | — | 81.9% |
| HLE | 4.9% | 7.3% |
| LiveCodeBench | — | 68.4% |
| AIME 2025 | — | 66.3% |
| SciCode | 7.2% | 30.7% |
| LCR | 13.7% | 51.3% |
| IFBench | 29.1% | 39.7% |
| TAU-bench v2 | 81.6% | 21.6% |
| TerminalBench Hard | 3.8% | 7.6% |
Key Takeaways
Qwen3.5 2B (Non-reasoning) offers the best value at $0.00/1M,making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct has the strongest reasoning profile with a 45.5 reasoning score,combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
Qwen3.5 2B (Non-reasoning) reaches a 2.4 coding index,making it the top choice for software development and code generation tasks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens,suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
Qwen3.5 2B (Non-reasoning)
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
- Code generation
- Software development
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
