Model Comparison
Qwen3.5 2B (Non-reasoning)
vs. R1 1776
Comparing 2 AI models · 8 benchmarks · Alibaba, Perplexity
Recommended Pick
PeR1 17762 metric winsStrongest on: Reasoning, Intelligence
Lowest Price
Qwen3.5 2B (Non-reasoning)
$0.00/1M input price
Best Reasoning
R1 1776
50.8 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Best for Coding
Qwen3.5 2B (Non-reasoning)
2.4 coding index
Composite Indices
Higher is better; speed and price are normalized
Standard Benchmarks
Only benchmarks with data are shown
Differences That Matter
Reasoning gap
R1 1776 leads Qwen3.5 2B (Non-reasoning) by 32.8 points on reasoning.
Top-pick rationale
R1 1776 wins 2 measurable categories, including Reasoning, Intelligence.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
Qwen3.5 2B (Non-reasoning)
Alibaba
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
R1 1776
Perplexity
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Chat with leading AI models
Use Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini alongside with EU-Hosted Models like Deepseek, Qwen & Kimi.
EU-hosted inference
Servers in Germany & Finland. Designed to meet strict GDPR and ISO 27001 compliance requirements.
Full Comparison
| Metric | Al Qwen3.5 2B (Non-reasoning) | Top Pick Pe R1 1776 |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $0.00/1M | $0.00/1M |
| Output Cost | $0.00/1M | $0.00/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | Alibaba | Perplexity |
| Release Date | Mar 2, 2026 | Feb 18, 2025 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | — | — |
| TTFT | — | — |
| Latency | — | — |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Reasoning Score | 18.1 | 50.8 |
| Intelligence | 5.6 | 6.3 |
| Coding | 2.4 | — |
| Standard Benchmarks | ||
| GPQA | 43.8% | — |
| HLE | 4.9% | — |
| MATH 500 | — | 95.4% |
| SciCode | 7.2% | — |
| LCR | 13.7% | — |
| IFBench | 29.1% | — |
| TAU-bench v2 | 81.6% | — |
| TerminalBench Hard | 3.8% | — |
Key Takeaways
Qwen3.5 2B (Non-reasoning) offers the best value at $0.00/1M,making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
R1 1776 has the strongest reasoning profile with a 50.8 reasoning score,combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
Qwen3.5 2B (Non-reasoning) reaches a 2.4 coding index,making it the top choice for software development and code generation tasks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens,suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
Qwen3.5 2B (Non-reasoning)
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
- Code generation
- Software development
R1 1776
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
