Model Comparison
Qwen3.5 2B (Non-reasoning)
vs. 30B (high)
Comparing 2 AI models · 7 benchmarks · Alibaba, Sarvam
Recommended Pick
AlQwen3.5 2B (Non-reasoning)8 metric winsStrongest on: Input price, Output price, TTFT
Lowest Price
Qwen3.5 2B (Non-reasoning)
$0.00/1M input price
Best Reasoning
30B (high)
25.6 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Best for Coding
Qwen3.5 2B (Non-reasoning)
2.4 coding index
Composite Indices
Higher is better; speed and price are normalized
Standard Benchmarks
Only benchmarks with data are shown
Differences That Matter
Price gap
Qwen3.5 2B (Non-reasoning) is ∞x cheaper on input tokens than 30B (high).
Reasoning gap
30B (high) leads Qwen3.5 2B (Non-reasoning) by 7.5 points on reasoning.
Top-pick rationale
Qwen3.5 2B (Non-reasoning) wins 8 measurable categories, including Input price, Output price, TTFT, Latency.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
Qwen3.5 2B (Non-reasoning)
Alibaba
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
30B (high)
Sarvam
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Chat with leading AI models
Use Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini alongside with EU-Hosted Models like Deepseek, Qwen & Kimi.
EU-hosted inference
Servers in Germany & Finland. Designed to meet strict GDPR and ISO 27001 compliance requirements.
Full Comparison
| Metric | Top Pick Al Qwen3.5 2B (Non-reasoning) | Sa 30B (high) |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $0.00/1M | $0.03/1M |
| Output Cost | $0.00/1M | $0.11/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | — | $0.05/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | Alibaba | Sarvam |
| Release Date | Mar 2, 2026 | Mar 6, 2026 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | — | 217.2 tok/s |
| TTFT | — | 1133ms |
| Latency | — | 10340ms |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | — | 100.0 |
| Reasoning Score | 18.1 | 25.6 |
| Intelligence | 5.6 | 6.6 |
| Coding | 2.4 | — |
| Standard Benchmarks | ||
| GPQA | 43.8% | 63.3% |
| HLE | 4.9% | 7.0% |
| SciCode | 7.2% | 19.2% |
| LCR | 13.7% | 0.0% |
| IFBench | 29.1% | 26.5% |
| TAU-bench v2 | 81.6% | 34.5% |
| TerminalBench Hard | 3.8% | 2.3% |
Key Takeaways
Qwen3.5 2B (Non-reasoning) offers the best value at $0.00/1M,making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
30B (high) has the strongest reasoning profile with a 25.6 reasoning score,combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
Qwen3.5 2B (Non-reasoning) reaches a 2.4 coding index,making it the top choice for software development and code generation tasks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens,suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
Qwen3.5 2B (Non-reasoning)
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
- Code generation
- Software development
30B (high)
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
