Model Comparison
Qwen3.5 35B A3B (Non-reasoning)
vs. GPT-5.6 Sol (max)
Comparing 2 AI models · 7 benchmarks · Alibaba, OpenAI
Recommended Pick
OpGPT-5.6 Sol (max)8 metric winsStrongest on: Reasoning, Intelligence, GPQA
Best Value
Qwen3.5 35B A3B (Non-reasoning)
100.0 value score
39.4 reasoning / $0.69/1M
Lowest Price
Qwen3.5 35B A3B (Non-reasoning)
$0.25/1M input price
Best Reasoning
GPT-5.6 Sol (max)
66.7 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Best for Coding
GPT-5.6 Sol (max)
77.4 coding index
Composite Indices
Higher is better; speed and price are normalized
Standard Benchmarks
Only benchmarks with data are shown
Differences That Matter
Best value
Qwen3.5 35B A3B (Non-reasoning) has the strongest quality-to-price mix at 100.0 out of 100 value points.
Price gap
Qwen3.5 35B A3B (Non-reasoning) is 20x cheaper on input tokens than GPT-5.6 Sol (max).
Speed gap
Qwen3.5 35B A3B (Non-reasoning) generates about 2.1x as many tokens per second as GPT-5.6 Sol (max).
Reasoning gap
GPT-5.6 Sol (max) leads Qwen3.5 35B A3B (Non-reasoning) by 27.4 points on reasoning.
Top-pick rationale
GPT-5.6 Sol (max) wins 8 measurable categories, including Reasoning, Intelligence, GPQA, HLE.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
Qwen3.5 35B A3B (Non-reasoning)
Alibaba
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
GPT-5.6 Sol (max)
OpenAI
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Chat with leading AI models
Use Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini alongside with EU-Hosted Models like Deepseek, Qwen & Kimi.
EU-hosted inference
Servers in Germany & Finland. Designed to meet strict GDPR and ISO 27001 compliance requirements.
Full Comparison
| Metric | Al Qwen3.5 35B A3B (Non-reasoning) | Top Pick Op GPT-5.6 Sol (max) |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $0.25/1M | $5.00/1M |
| Output Cost | $2.00/1M | $30.00/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.69/1M | $11.25/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | Alibaba | OpenAI |
| Release Date | Feb 24, 2026 | Jul 9, 2026 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | 193.9 tok/s | 90.9 tok/s |
| TTFT | 1213ms | 83039ms |
| Latency | 1213ms | 83039ms |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | 100.0 | 10.4 |
| Reasoning Score | 39.4 | 66.7 |
| Intelligence | 23.4 | 58.9 |
| Coding | — | 77.4 |
| Standard Benchmarks | ||
| GPQA | 81.9% | 94.1% |
| HLE | 12.8% | 47.2% |
| SciCode | 29.3% | 56.1% |
| LCR | 55.3% | 73.7% |
| IFBench | 44.5% | 72.7% |
| TAU-bench v2 | 86.3% | 85.1% |
| TerminalBench Hard | 10.6% | 65.9% |
Key Takeaways
Qwen3.5 35B A3B (Non-reasoning) offers the best value at $0.25/1M,making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
GPT-5.6 Sol (max) has the strongest reasoning profile with a 66.7 reasoning score,combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
GPT-5.6 Sol (max) reaches a 77.4 coding index,making it the top choice for software development and code generation tasks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens,suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
Qwen3.5 35B A3B (Non-reasoning)
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
GPT-5.6 Sol (max)
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
- Code generation
- Software development
