Model Comparison
Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Non-reasoning)
vs. Qwen3 Max Thinking (Preview)
Comparing 2 AI models · 10 benchmarks · Alibaba
Recommended Pick
AlQwen3.5 397B A17B (Non-reasoning)12 metric winsStrongest on: Value, Input price, Output price
Best Value
Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Non-reasoning)
100.0 value score
45.6 reasoning / $1.35/1M
Lowest Price
Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Non-reasoning)
$0.60/1M input price
Best Reasoning
Qwen3 Max Thinking (Preview)
55.8 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Composite Indices
Higher is better; speed and price are normalized
Standard Benchmarks
Only benchmarks with data are shown
Differences That Matter
Best value
Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Non-reasoning) has the strongest quality-to-price mix at 100.0 out of 100 value points.
Price gap
Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Non-reasoning) is 2.0x cheaper on input tokens than Qwen3 Max Thinking (Preview).
Reasoning gap
Qwen3 Max Thinking (Preview) leads Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Non-reasoning) by 10.2 points on reasoning.
Top-pick rationale
Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Non-reasoning) wins 12 measurable categories, including Value, Input price, Output price, Blended price.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Non-reasoning)
Alibaba
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Qwen3 Max Thinking (Preview)
Alibaba
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Chat with leading AI models
Use Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini alongside with EU-Hosted Models like Deepseek, Qwen & Kimi.
EU-hosted inference
Servers in Germany & Finland. Designed to meet strict GDPR and ISO 27001 compliance requirements.
Full Comparison
| Metric | Top Pick Al Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Non-reasoning) | Al Qwen3 Max Thinking (Preview) |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $0.60/1M | $1.20/1M |
| Output Cost | $3.60/1M | $6.00/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | $1.35/1M | $2.40/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | Alibaba | Alibaba |
| Release Date | Feb 16, 2026 | Nov 3, 2025 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | 59.0 tok/s | 61.5 tok/s |
| TTFT | 1909ms | 1770ms |
| Latency | 1909ms | 34268ms |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | 100.0 | 68.8 |
| Reasoning Score | 45.6 | 55.8 |
| Intelligence | 32.0 | 25.0 |
| Math | — | 82.3 |
| Standard Benchmarks | ||
| GPQA | 86.1% | 77.6% |
| MMLU Pro | — | 82.4% |
| HLE | 18.8% | 12.0% |
| LiveCodeBench | — | 53.5% |
| AIME 2025 | — | 82.3% |
| SciCode | 41.1% | 38.7% |
| LCR | 58.0% | 57.7% |
| IFBench | 51.6% | 53.8% |
| TAU-bench v2 | 83.9% | 83.6% |
| TerminalBench Hard | 35.6% | 17.4% |
Key Takeaways
Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Non-reasoning) offers the best value at $0.60/1M,making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
Qwen3 Max Thinking (Preview) has the strongest reasoning profile with a 55.8 reasoning score,combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens,suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Non-reasoning)
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
Qwen3 Max Thinking (Preview)
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
