Model Comparison
Qwen3.5 9B (Non-reasoning)
vs. Qwen3.6 35B A3B (Reasoning)
Comparing 2 AI models · 7 benchmarks · Alibaba
Recommended Pick
Al Qwen3.6 35B A3B (Reasoning) 11 metric wins Strongest on: Throughput, Reasoning, Intelligence
Lowest Price
Qwen3.5 9B (Non-reasoning)
$0.00/1M input price
Best Reasoning
Qwen3.6 35B A3B (Reasoning)
45.8 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Best for Coding
Qwen3.6 35B A3B (Reasoning)
35.2 coding index
Composite Indices
Higher is better; speed and price are normalized
Standard Benchmarks
Only benchmarks with data are shown
Differences That Matter
Price gap
Qwen3.5 9B (Non-reasoning) is ∞x cheaper on input tokens than Qwen3.6 35B A3B (Reasoning).
Reasoning gap
Qwen3.6 35B A3B (Reasoning) leads Qwen3.5 9B (Non-reasoning) by 9.9 points on reasoning.
Coding gap
Qwen3.6 35B A3B (Reasoning) leads Qwen3.5 9B (Non-reasoning) by 13.9 points on coding.
Top-pick rationale
Qwen3.6 35B A3B (Reasoning) wins 11 measurable categories, including Throughput, Reasoning, Intelligence, Coding.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
Qwen3.5 9B (Non-reasoning)
Alibaba
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Qwen3.6 35B A3B (Reasoning)
Alibaba
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Full Comparison
| Metric | Al Qwen3.5 9B (Non-reasoning) | Top Pick Al Qwen3.6 35B A3B (Reasoning) |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $0.00/1M | $0.25/1M |
| Output Cost | $0.00/1M | $1.49/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | — | $0.56/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | Alibaba | Alibaba |
| Release Date | Mar 2, 2026 | Apr 16, 2026 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | — | 158.0 tok/s |
| TTFT | — | 1241ms |
| Latency | — | 35392ms |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | — | 100.0 |
| Reasoning Score | 35.8 | 45.8 |
| Intelligence | 20.3 | 33.0 |
| Coding | 21.3 | 35.2 |
| Standard Benchmarks | ||
| GPQA | 78.6% | 84.1% |
| HLE | 8.6% | 20.2% |
| SciCode | 27.7% | 35.8% |
| LCR | 38.0% | 63.7% |
| IFBench | 37.8% | 64.4% |
| TAU-bench v2 | 85.1% | 95.3% |
| TerminalBench Hard | 18.2% | 34.8% |
Key Takeaways
Qwen3.5 9B (Non-reasoning) offers the best value at $0.00/1M, making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
Qwen3.6 35B A3B (Reasoning) has the strongest reasoning profile with a 45.8 reasoning score, combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
Qwen3.6 35B A3B (Reasoning) reaches a 35.2 coding index, making it the top choice for software development and code generation tasks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens, suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
Qwen3.5 9B (Non-reasoning)
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
Qwen3.6 35B A3B (Reasoning)
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
- Code generation
- Software development
