Model Comparison
Qwen3.5 9B (Non-reasoning)
vs. Reka Flash (Sep '24)
Comparing 2 AI models · 0 benchmarks · Alibaba, Reka AI
Recommended Pick
Strongest on: Input price, Output price, Blended price
Lowest Price
Qwen3.5 9B (Non-reasoning)
$0.17/1M input price
Differences That Matter
Price gap
Qwen3.5 9B (Non-reasoning) is 1.2x cheaper on input tokens than Reka Flash (Sep '24).
Top-pick rationale
Qwen3.5 9B (Non-reasoning) wins 3 measurable categories, including Input price, Output price, Blended price.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
Qwen3.5 9B (Non-reasoning)
Alibaba
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Reka Flash (Sep '24)
Reka AI
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Secure AI Chat made in Europe
Chat with EU-Hosted Models like Deepseek, Qwen & Kimi: open-weight, transparent, no lock-in.
EU-hosted open models, one API
Servers in Germany & Finland. Operated by a German company under the GDPR, DPA available, ISO 27001-certified data centres.
Full Comparison
| Metric | Top Pick Al Qwen3.5 9B (Non-reasoning) | Re Reka Flash (Sep '24) |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $0.17/1M | $0.20/1M |
| Output Cost | $0.25/1M | $0.80/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.19/1M | $0.35/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | Alibaba | Reka AI |
| Release Date | Mar 2, 2026 | Oct 4, 2024 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | 120.5 tok/s | — |
| TTFT | 580ms | — |
| Latency | 580ms | — |
Key Takeaways
Qwen3.5 9B (Non-reasoning) offers the best value at $0.17/1M,making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens,suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
Qwen3.5 9B (Non-reasoning)
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
Reka Flash (Sep '24)
- General-purpose AI
- Versatile applications