Model Comparison
Qwen3.5 Omni Flash
vs. Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct
Comparing 2 AI models · 12 benchmarks · Alibaba
Recommended Pick
AlQwen3.5 Omni Flash13 metric winsStrongest on: Value, Input price, Output price
Best Value
Qwen3.5 Omni Flash
100.0 value score
33.4 reasoning / $0.28/1M
Lowest Price
Qwen3.5 Omni Flash
$0.10/1M input price
Best Reasoning
Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct
35.2 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Composite Indices
Higher is better; speed and price are normalized
Standard Benchmarks
Only benchmarks with data are shown
Differences That Matter
Best value
Qwen3.5 Omni Flash has the strongest quality-to-price mix at 100.0 out of 100 value points.
Price gap
Qwen3.5 Omni Flash is 4.5x cheaper on input tokens than Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct.
Speed gap
Qwen3.5 Omni Flash generates about 2.4x as many tokens per second as Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct.
Reasoning gap
Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct leads Qwen3.5 Omni Flash by 1.7 points on reasoning.
Top-pick rationale
Qwen3.5 Omni Flash wins 13 measurable categories, including Value, Input price, Output price, Blended price.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
Qwen3.5 Omni Flash
Alibaba
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct
Alibaba
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Chat with leading AI models
Use Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini alongside with EU-Hosted Models like Deepseek, Qwen & Kimi.
EU-hosted inference
Servers in Germany & Finland. Designed to meet strict GDPR and ISO 27001 compliance requirements.
Full Comparison
| Metric | Top Pick Al Qwen3.5 Omni Flash | Al Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $0.10/1M | $0.45/1M |
| Output Cost | $0.80/1M | $2.25/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.28/1M | $0.90/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | Alibaba | Alibaba |
| Release Date | Mar 30, 2026 | Jul 31, 2025 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | 245.1 tok/s | 103.8 tok/s |
| TTFT | 1068ms | 1499ms |
| Latency | 1068ms | 1499ms |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | 100.0 | 32.1 |
| Reasoning Score | 33.4 | 35.2 |
| Intelligence | 19.0 | 13.6 |
| Math | — | 29.0 |
| Standard Benchmarks | ||
| GPQA | 74.2% | 51.6% |
| MMLU Pro | — | 70.6% |
| HLE | 7.1% | 4.0% |
| LiveCodeBench | — | 40.3% |
| MATH 500 | — | 89.3% |
| AIME 2025 | — | 29.0% |
| AIME (Original) | — | 29.7% |
| SciCode | 25.5% | 27.8% |
| LCR | 44.0% | 29.0% |
| IFBench | 38.0% | 32.7% |
| TAU-bench v2 | 84.5% | 34.5% |
| TerminalBench Hard | 8.3% | 15.2% |
Key Takeaways
Qwen3.5 Omni Flash offers the best value at $0.10/1M,making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct has the strongest reasoning profile with a 35.2 reasoning score,combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens,suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
Qwen3.5 Omni Flash
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
