Model Comparison
Qwen3.5 Omni Flash
vs. 30B (high)
Comparing 2 AI models · 7 benchmarks · Alibaba, Sarvam
Recommended Pick
AlQwen3.5 Omni Flash11 metric winsStrongest on: Throughput, Latency, Reasoning
Best Value
30B (high)
100.0 value score
25.6 reasoning / $0.05/1M
Lowest Price
30B (high)
$0.03/1M input price
Best Reasoning
Qwen3.5 Omni Flash
33.4 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Composite Indices
Higher is better; speed and price are normalized
Standard Benchmarks
Only benchmarks with data are shown
Differences That Matter
Best value
30B (high) has the strongest quality-to-price mix at 100.0 out of 100 value points.
Price gap
30B (high) is 3.8x cheaper on input tokens than Qwen3.5 Omni Flash.
Speed gap
Qwen3.5 Omni Flash generates about 1.2x as many tokens per second as 30B (high).
Reasoning gap
Qwen3.5 Omni Flash leads 30B (high) by 7.8 points on reasoning.
Top-pick rationale
Qwen3.5 Omni Flash wins 11 measurable categories, including Throughput, Latency, Reasoning, Intelligence.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
Qwen3.5 Omni Flash
Alibaba
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
30B (high)
Sarvam
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Chat with leading AI models
Use Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini alongside with EU-Hosted Models like Deepseek, Qwen & Kimi.
EU-hosted inference
Servers in Germany & Finland. Designed to meet strict GDPR and ISO 27001 compliance requirements.
Full Comparison
| Metric | Top Pick Al Qwen3.5 Omni Flash | Sa 30B (high) |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $0.10/1M | $0.03/1M |
| Output Cost | $0.80/1M | $0.11/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.28/1M | $0.05/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | Alibaba | Sarvam |
| Release Date | Mar 30, 2026 | Mar 6, 2026 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | 255.7 tok/s | 217.2 tok/s |
| TTFT | 1144ms | 1134ms |
| Latency | 1144ms | 10342ms |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | 22.3 | 100.0 |
| Reasoning Score | 33.4 | 25.6 |
| Intelligence | 19.0 | 6.6 |
| Standard Benchmarks | ||
| GPQA | 74.2% | 63.3% |
| HLE | 7.1% | 7.0% |
| SciCode | 25.5% | 19.2% |
| LCR | 44.0% | 0.0% |
| IFBench | 38.0% | 26.5% |
| TAU-bench v2 | 84.5% | 34.5% |
| TerminalBench Hard | 8.3% | 2.3% |
Key Takeaways
30B (high) offers the best value at $0.03/1M,making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
Qwen3.5 Omni Flash has the strongest reasoning profile with a 33.4 reasoning score,combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens,suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
Qwen3.5 Omni Flash
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
30B (high)
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
