Model Comparison
Qwen3.6 27B (Non-reasoning)
vs. Qwen3 Max Thinking
Comparing 2 AI models · 7 benchmarks · Alibaba
Recommended Pick
AlQwen3 Max Thinking12 metric winsStrongest on: Input price, Output price, TTFT
Lowest Price
Qwen3 Max Thinking
$0.00/1M input price
Best Reasoning
Qwen3 Max Thinking
48.0 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Best for Coding
Qwen3.6 27B (Non-reasoning)
46.6 coding index
Composite Indices
Higher is better; speed and price are normalized
Standard Benchmarks
Only benchmarks with data are shown
Differences That Matter
Price gap
Qwen3 Max Thinking is ∞x cheaper on input tokens than Qwen3.6 27B (Non-reasoning).
Reasoning gap
Qwen3 Max Thinking leads Qwen3.6 27B (Non-reasoning) by 5.7 points on reasoning.
Top-pick rationale
Qwen3 Max Thinking wins 12 measurable categories, including Input price, Output price, TTFT, Latency.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
Qwen3.6 27B (Non-reasoning)
Alibaba
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Qwen3 Max Thinking
Alibaba
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Chat with leading AI models
Use Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini alongside with EU-Hosted Models like Deepseek, Qwen & Kimi.
EU-hosted inference
Servers in Germany & Finland. Designed to meet strict GDPR and ISO 27001 compliance requirements.
Full Comparison
| Metric | Al Qwen3.6 27B (Non-reasoning) | Top Pick Al Qwen3 Max Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $0.60/1M | $0.00/1M |
| Output Cost | $3.60/1M | $0.00/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | $1.35/1M | — |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | Alibaba | Alibaba |
| Release Date | Apr 22, 2026 | Jan 26, 2026 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | 63.3 tok/s | — |
| TTFT | 1386ms | — |
| Latency | 1386ms | — |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | 100.0 | — |
| Reasoning Score | 42.3 | 48.0 |
| Intelligence | 30.5 | 31.7 |
| Coding | 46.6 | — |
| Standard Benchmarks | ||
| GPQA | 82.9% | 86.1% |
| HLE | 13.6% | 26.2% |
| SciCode | 37.3% | 43.1% |
| LCR | 55.0% | 66.0% |
| IFBench | 45.7% | 70.7% |
| TAU-bench v2 | 93.6% | 83.6% |
| TerminalBench Hard | 21.2% | 24.2% |
Key Takeaways
Qwen3 Max Thinking offers the best value at $0.00/1M,making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
Qwen3 Max Thinking has the strongest reasoning profile with a 48.0 reasoning score,combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
Qwen3.6 27B (Non-reasoning) reaches a 46.6 coding index,making it the top choice for software development and code generation tasks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens,suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
Qwen3.6 27B (Non-reasoning)
- Code generation
- Software development
Qwen3 Max Thinking
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
