Model Comparison
Qwen3.6 27B (Non-reasoning)
vs. Solar Pro 4
Comparing 2 AI models · 0 benchmarks · Alibaba, Upstage
Recommended Pick
UpSolar Pro 49 metric winsStrongest on: Value, Input price, Output price
Best Value
Solar Pro 4
100.0 value score
32.7 reasoning / $0.52/1M
Lowest Price
Solar Pro 4
$0.30/1M input price
Best Reasoning
Solar Pro 4
32.7 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Best for Coding
Solar Pro 4
52.7 coding index
Differences That Matter
Best value
Solar Pro 4 has the strongest quality-to-price mix at 100.0 out of 100 value points.
Price gap
Solar Pro 4 is 2.0x cheaper on input tokens than Qwen3.6 27B (Non-reasoning).
Speed gap
Solar Pro 4 generates about 1.2x as many tokens per second as Qwen3.6 27B (Non-reasoning).
Reasoning gap
Solar Pro 4 leads Qwen3.6 27B (Non-reasoning) by 9.4 points on reasoning.
Coding gap
Solar Pro 4 leads Qwen3.6 27B (Non-reasoning) by 6.1 points on coding.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
Qwen3.6 27B (Non-reasoning)
Alibaba
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Solar Pro 4
Upstage
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Secure AI Chat made in Europe
Processing terms vary by selected model. Review the current Privacy Policy and DPA before using sensitive data.
OpenAI-compatible inference
Choose from the current model catalog. Processing terms vary by selected model and service.
Full Comparison
| Metric | Al Qwen3.6 27B (Non-reasoning) | Top Pick Up Solar Pro 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $0.60/1M | $0.30/1M |
| Output Cost | $3.60/1M | $1.20/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | $1.35/1M | $0.52/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | Alibaba | Upstage |
| Release Date | Apr 22, 2026 | Aug 6, 2026 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | 57.8 tok/s | 70.1 tok/s |
| TTFT | 3610ms | 1980ms |
| Latency | 3610ms | 30520ms |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | 27.7 | 100.0 |
| Reasoning Score | 23.3 | 32.7 |
| Intelligence | 23.3 | 32.7 |
| Coding | 46.6 | 52.7 |
Key Takeaways
Solar Pro 4 offers the best value at $0.30/1M,making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
Solar Pro 4 has the strongest reasoning profile with a 32.7 reasoning score,combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
Solar Pro 4 reaches a 52.7 coding index,making it the top choice for software development and code generation tasks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens,suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
Qwen3.6 27B (Non-reasoning)
- General-purpose AI
- Versatile applications
Solar Pro 4
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
- Code generation
- Software development
