Model Comparison
Qwen3.6 35B A3B (Reasoning)
vs. Qwen3 Coder Next
Comparing 2 AI models · 0 benchmarks · Alibaba
Recommended Pick
AlQwen3 Coder Next5 metric winsStrongest on: Input price, Output price, Blended price
Lowest Price
Qwen3 Coder Next
$0.31/1M input price
Differences That Matter
Price gap
Qwen3 Coder Next is 1.2x cheaper on input tokens than Qwen3.6 35B A3B (Reasoning).
Speed gap
Qwen3.6 35B A3B (Reasoning) generates about 1.4x as many tokens per second as Qwen3 Coder Next.
Top-pick rationale
Qwen3 Coder Next wins 5 measurable categories, including Input price, Output price, Blended price, TTFT.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
Qwen3.6 35B A3B (Reasoning)
Alibaba
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Qwen3 Coder Next
Alibaba
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Secure AI Chat made in Europe
Chat with EU-Hosted Models like Deepseek, Qwen & Kimi: open-weight, transparent, no lock-in.
EU-hosted open models, one API
Servers in Germany & Finland. Operated by a German company under the GDPR, DPA available, ISO 27001-certified data centres.
Full Comparison
| Metric | Al Qwen3.6 35B A3B (Reasoning) | Top Pick Al Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $0.38/1M | $0.31/1M |
| Output Cost | $2.25/1M | $1.00/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.84/1M | $0.48/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | Alibaba | Alibaba |
| Release Date | Apr 16, 2026 | Feb 3, 2026 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | 120.7 tok/s | 87.0 tok/s |
| TTFT | 2050ms | 880ms |
| Latency | 46740ms | 880ms |
Key Takeaways
Qwen3 Coder Next offers the best value at $0.31/1M,making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens,suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
Qwen3.6 35B A3B (Reasoning)
- General-purpose AI
- Versatile applications
Qwen3 Coder Next
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
Recommended Comparisons
Popular alternatives
