Model Comparison
Qwen3.6 35B A3B (Non-reasoning)
vs. Step 3.5 Flash
Comparing 2 AI models · 0 benchmarks · Alibaba, StepFun
Recommended Pick
StStep 3.5 Flash8 metric winsStrongest on: Value, Input price, Output price
Best Value
Step 3.5 Flash
100.0 value score
26.0 reasoning / $0.15/1M
Lowest Price
Step 3.5 Flash
$0.10/1M input price
Best Reasoning
Step 3.5 Flash
26.0 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Best for Coding
Qwen3.6 35B A3B (Non-reasoning)
28.1 coding index
Differences That Matter
Best value
Step 3.5 Flash has the strongest quality-to-price mix at 100.0 out of 100 value points.
Price gap
Step 3.5 Flash is 3.8x cheaper on input tokens than Qwen3.6 35B A3B (Non-reasoning).
Speed gap
Step 3.5 Flash generates about 1.5x as many tokens per second as Qwen3.6 35B A3B (Non-reasoning).
Reasoning gap
Step 3.5 Flash leads Qwen3.6 35B A3B (Non-reasoning) by 1.4 points on reasoning.
Top-pick rationale
Step 3.5 Flash wins 8 measurable categories, including Value, Input price, Output price, Blended price.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
Qwen3.6 35B A3B (Non-reasoning)
Alibaba
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Step 3.5 Flash
StepFun
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Secure AI Chat made in Europe
Processing terms vary by selected model. Review the current Privacy Policy and DPA before using sensitive data.
OpenAI-compatible inference
Choose from the current model catalog. Processing terms vary by selected model and service.
Full Comparison
| Metric | Al Qwen3.6 35B A3B (Non-reasoning) | Top Pick St Step 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $0.38/1M | $0.10/1M |
| Output Cost | $2.25/1M | $0.30/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.85/1M | $0.15/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | Alibaba | StepFun |
| Release Date | Apr 16, 2026 | Feb 2, 2026 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | 145.0 tok/s | 214.0 tok/s |
| TTFT | 2100ms | 1050ms |
| Latency | 2100ms | 10400ms |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | 16.7 | 100.0 |
| Reasoning Score | 24.6 | 26.0 |
| Intelligence | 24.6 | 26.0 |
| Coding | 28.1 | — |
Key Takeaways
Step 3.5 Flash offers the best value at $0.10/1M,making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
Step 3.5 Flash has the strongest reasoning profile with a 26.0 reasoning score,combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
Qwen3.6 35B A3B (Non-reasoning) reaches a 28.1 coding index,making it the top choice for software development and code generation tasks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens,suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
Qwen3.6 35B A3B (Non-reasoning)
- Code generation
- Software development
Step 3.5 Flash
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
