Model Comparison
Qwen3.6 Plus
vs. Solar Pro 2 (Non-reasoning)
Comparing 2 AI models · 12 benchmarks · Alibaba, Upstage
Recommended Pick
Al Qwen3.6 Plus 11 metric wins Strongest on: Throughput, Reasoning, Intelligence
Lowest Price
Solar Pro 2 (Non-reasoning)
$0.00/1M input price
Best Reasoning
Qwen3.6 Plus
54.6 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Best for Coding
Qwen3.6 Plus
42.9 coding index
Composite Indices
Higher is better; speed and price are normalized
Standard Benchmarks
Only benchmarks with data are shown
Differences That Matter
Price gap
Solar Pro 2 (Non-reasoning) is ∞x cheaper on input tokens than Qwen3.6 Plus.
Reasoning gap
Qwen3.6 Plus leads Solar Pro 2 (Non-reasoning) by 17.1 points on reasoning.
Coding gap
Qwen3.6 Plus leads Solar Pro 2 (Non-reasoning) by 31.6 points on coding.
Top-pick rationale
Qwen3.6 Plus wins 11 measurable categories, including Throughput, Reasoning, Intelligence, Coding.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
Qwen3.6 Plus
Alibaba
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Solar Pro 2 (Non-reasoning)
Upstage
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Full Comparison
| Metric | Top Pick Al Qwen3.6 Plus | Up Solar Pro 2 (Non-reasoning) |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $0.50/1M | $0.00/1M |
| Output Cost | $3.00/1M | $0.00/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | $1.13/1M | — |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | Alibaba | Upstage |
| Release Date | Apr 2, 2026 | Jul 9, 2025 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | 52.7 tok/s | — |
| TTFT | 1798ms | — |
| Latency | 107151ms | — |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | 100.0 | — |
| Reasoning Score | 54.6 | 37.6 |
| Intelligence | 50.0 | 13.6 |
| Coding | 42.9 | 11.3 |
| Math | — | 30.0 |
| Standard Benchmarks | ||
| GPQA | 88.2% | 56.1% |
| MMLU Pro | — | 75.0% |
| HLE | 25.7% | 3.8% |
| LiveCodeBench | — | 42.4% |
| MATH 500 | — | 88.9% |
| AIME 2025 | — | 30.0% |
| AIME (Original) | — | 40.7% |
| SciCode | 40.7% | 24.8% |
| LCR | 69.7% | 0.0% |
| IFBench | 75.2% | 33.7% |
| TAU-bench v2 | 97.7% | 31.9% |
| TerminalBench Hard | 43.9% | 4.5% |
Key Takeaways
Solar Pro 2 (Non-reasoning) offers the best value at $0.00/1M, making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
Qwen3.6 Plus has the strongest reasoning profile with a 54.6 reasoning score, combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
Qwen3.6 Plus reaches a 42.9 coding index, making it the top choice for software development and code generation tasks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens, suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
Qwen3.6 Plus
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
- Code generation
- Software development
Solar Pro 2 (Non-reasoning)
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
