Model Comparison
Qwen3.7 Max
vs. Solar Open 100B (Reasoning)
Comparing 2 AI models · 7 benchmarks · Alibaba, Upstage
Recommended Pick
Al Qwen3.7 Max 11 metric wins Strongest on: Throughput, Reasoning, Intelligence
Lowest Price
Solar Open 100B (Reasoning)
$0.00/1M input price
Best Reasoning
Qwen3.7 Max
62.3 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Best for Coding
Qwen3.7 Max
50.1 coding index
Composite Indices
Higher is better; speed and price are normalized
Standard Benchmarks
Only benchmarks with data are shown
Differences That Matter
Price gap
Solar Open 100B (Reasoning) is ∞x cheaper on input tokens than Qwen3.7 Max.
Reasoning gap
Qwen3.7 Max leads Solar Open 100B (Reasoning) by 30.1 points on reasoning.
Coding gap
Qwen3.7 Max leads Solar Open 100B (Reasoning) by 39.6 points on coding.
Top-pick rationale
Qwen3.7 Max wins 11 measurable categories, including Throughput, Reasoning, Intelligence, Coding.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
Qwen3.7 Max
Alibaba
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Solar Open 100B (Reasoning)
Upstage
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Full Comparison
| Metric | Top Pick Al Qwen3.7 Max | Up Solar Open 100B (Reasoning) |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $2.50/1M | $0.00/1M |
| Output Cost | $7.50/1M | $0.00/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | $3.75/1M | — |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | Alibaba | Upstage |
| Release Date | May 19, 2026 | Dec 17, 2025 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | 187.7 tok/s | — |
| TTFT | 1604ms | — |
| Latency | 14437ms | — |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | 100.0 | — |
| Reasoning Score | 62.3 | 32.2 |
| Intelligence | 56.6 | 21.7 |
| Coding | 50.1 | 10.5 |
| Standard Benchmarks | ||
| GPQA | 92.3% | 65.7% |
| HLE | 38.1% | 9.2% |
| SciCode | 48.8% | 26.9% |
| LCR | 69.0% | 36.0% |
| IFBench | 80.5% | 57.7% |
| TAU-bench v2 | 94.7% | 48.2% |
| TerminalBench Hard | 50.8% | 2.3% |
Key Takeaways
Solar Open 100B (Reasoning) offers the best value at $0.00/1M, making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
Qwen3.7 Max has the strongest reasoning profile with a 62.3 reasoning score, combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
Qwen3.7 Max reaches a 50.1 coding index, making it the top choice for software development and code generation tasks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens, suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
Qwen3.7 Max
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
- Code generation
- Software development
Solar Open 100B (Reasoning)
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
