Model Comparison
Qwen3.7 Plus
vs. Beam 1.0
Qwen3.7 Plus has not been available at LLMBase since 26 October 2026. Open alternative: Qwen3.8 27B →
Comparing 2 AI models · 0 benchmarks · Alibaba, Reflection
Recommended Pick
ReBeam 1.05 metric winsStrongest on: Output price, Blended price, Throughput
Lowest Price
Qwen3.7 Plus
$0.40/1M input price
Differences That Matter
Speed gap
Beam 1.0 generates about 6.9x as many tokens per second as Qwen3.7 Plus.
Top-pick rationale
Beam 1.0 wins 5 measurable categories, including Output price, Blended price, Throughput, TTFT.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
Qwen3.7 Plus
Alibaba
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Beam 1.0
Reflection
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
EU-hosted open models, one API
Servers in Germany & Finland. Operated by a German company under the GDPR, DPA available, ISO 27001-certified data centres.
Full Comparison
| Metric | Al Qwen3.7 Plus | Top Pick Re Beam 1.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $0.40/1M | $0.40/1M |
| Output Cost | $1.60/1M | $1.20/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.70/1M | $0.60/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | Alibaba | Reflection |
| Release Date | Jun 1, 2026 | Oct 16, 2026 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | 56.5 tok/s | 388.7 tok/s |
| TTFT | 2160ms | 700ms |
| Latency | 37560ms | 5850ms |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | — | 100.0 |
| Reasoning Score | — | 17.7 |
| Intelligence | — | 17.7 |
Key Takeaways
Qwen3.7 Plus offers the best value at $0.40/1M,making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens,suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
Qwen3.7 Plus
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
Beam 1.0
- General-purpose AI
- Versatile applications
Recommended Comparisons
Popular alternatives
