Model Comparison

Qwen3.7 Plus
vs. M (Reasoning, Based on Mistral Small 3.1)

Qwen3.7 Plus has not been available at LLMBase since 26 October 2026. Open alternative: Qwen3.8 27B →

Comparing 2 AI models · 0 benchmarks · Alibaba, Sarvam

Recommended Pick

M (Reasoning, Based on Mistral Small 3.1)2 metric wins

Strongest on: Input price, Output price

Lowest Price

M (Reasoning, Based on Mistral Small 3.1)

$0.00/1M input price

Differences That Matter

Price gap

M (Reasoning, Based on Mistral Small 3.1) is ∞x cheaper on input tokens than Qwen3.7 Plus.

Top-pick rationale

M (Reasoning, Based on Mistral Small 3.1) wins 2 measurable categories, including Input price, Output price.

Live compare

Response Face-Off

Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.

10 comparisons left in 24h

Qwen3.7 Plus

Alibaba

Waiting

TTFT

—

Time

—

tok/s

—

Tokens

—

Cost

—

Waiting

M (Reasoning, Based on Mistral Small 3.1)

Sarvam

Waiting

TTFT

—

Time

—

tok/s

—

Tokens

—

Cost

—

Waiting

Which answer was more useful?

EU-hosted open models, one API

Servers in Germany & Finland. Operated by a German company under the GDPR, DPA available, ISO 27001-certified data centres.

Get API access

Full Comparison

Metric	Al Qwen3.7 Plus Alibaba	Top Pick Sa M (Reasoning, Based on Mistral Small 3.1) Sarvam
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input Cost	$0.40/1M	$0.00/1M
Output Cost	$1.60/1M	$0.00/1M
Blended (3:1)	$0.70/1M	—
Specifications
Organization	Alibaba	Sarvam
Release Date	Jun 1, 2026	May 23, 2025
Performance & Speed
Throughput	57.2 tok/s	—
TTFT	2160ms	—
Latency	37110ms	—

Key Takeaways

M (Reasoning, Based on Mistral Small 3.1) offers the best value at $0.00/1M,making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.

All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens,suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.